Sridhar Ramaswamy suggests software valuation multiples are contracting because investors see through the strategy of just adding an 'AI SKU.' The market believes this approach won't win, favoring integrated, consumption-based models where customers only pay for demonstrated value from AI.
Related Insights
A market bifurcation is underway where investors prioritize AI startups with extreme growth rates over traditional SaaS companies. This creates a "changing of the guard," forcing established SaaS players to adopt AI aggressively or risk being devalued as legacy assets, while AI-native firms command premium valuations.
The "SaaS-pocalypse" isn't about AI replacing software overnight. Instead, AI's disruptive potential erases the decades-long growth certainty that justified high SaaS valuations. Investors are punishing this newfound unpredictability of future cash flows, regardless of current performance.
The "SaaSpocalypse" isn't about current revenues but a collapse in investor confidence. AI introduces profound uncertainty about future cash flows, causing the market to heavily discount what was once seen as bond-like predictability. SaaS firms must now actively prove they are beneficiaries of AI to regain their premium valuations.
AI is making core software functionality nearly free, creating an existential crisis for traditional SaaS companies. The old model of 90%+ gross margins is disappearing. The future will be dominated by a few large AI players with lower margins, alongside a strategic shift towards monetizing high-value services.
Software has long commanded premium valuations due to near-zero marginal distribution costs. AI breaks this model. The significant, variable cost of inference means expenses scale with usage, fundamentally altering software's economic profile and forcing valuations down toward those of traditional industries.
The ongoing decline in growth rates for public SaaS companies has created an existential crisis around revenue durability. Investors have lost confidence that traditional SaaS models can sustain growth in the face of AI disruption, leading to a massive valuation collapse.
The recent $300B SaaS stock sell-off wasn't driven by current performance. Investors are repricing stocks based on deep uncertainty about whether legacy software companies or AI-native firms will capture the value of automating human labor in the next 3-5 years.
AI is moving beyond enhancing worker productivity to completing entire projects, like drug discovery or engineering designs. This shift means software will be priced like a services business, based on the value of the outcome delivered, not the number of users with access.
Established SaaS companies with strong, but not explosive, growth will struggle to raise new venture capital. Their path forward involves running a capital-efficient business while aggressively integrating AI to create new tailwinds, or else face a long, slow grind to a modest exit without further investment.
Sierra CEO Bret Taylor argues that transitioning from per-seat software licensing to value-based AI agents is a business model disruption, not just a technological one. Public companies struggle to navigate this shift as it creates a 'trough of despair' in quarterly earnings, threatening their core revenue before the new model matures.
