Investor Victor Orlovski writes 10-15 pages of notes when he passes on a company, compared to only 5-6 pages for an investment. This disciplined reflection on "anti-portfolio" decisions allows him to analyze his reasoning, identify biases, and improve his investment judgment over time.

Related Insights

The discipline of writing down your thought process is crucial for decision analysis. AI now amplifies this by creating a searchable, analyzable record of your thinking over time, helping you identify blind spots and get objective feedback on your reasoning.

To avoid confirmation bias and make disciplined capital allocation decisions, investors should treat every follow-on opportunity in a portfolio company as if it were a brand-new deal. This involves a full 're-underwriting' process, assessing the current state and future potential without prejudice from past involvement.

An investor's best career P&L winners are not immediate yeses. They often involve an initial pass by either the investor or the company. This shows that timing and building relationships over multiple rounds can be more crucial than a single early-stage decision, as a 'missed round' isn't a 'missed company'.

Post-mortems of bad investments reveal the cause is never a calculation error but always a psychological bias or emotional trap. Sequoia catalogs ~40 of these, including failing to separate the emotional 'thrill of the chase' from the clinical, objective assessment required for sound decision-making.

Both the host and guest agree that writing is a powerful tool for refining investment ideas. The process forces clarity and exposes unanswered questions, a discipline Warren Buffett also advocates. If you can't cogently explain your thesis on paper, it's likely flawed.

A crucial, yet unquantifiable, component of alpha is avoiding catastrophic losses. Jeff Aronson points to spending years analyzing companies his firm ultimately passed on. While this discipline doesn't appear as a positive return on a performance sheet, the act of rigorously saying "no" is a real, though invisible, driver of long-term success.

An investor can have pages of notes yet still lack clarity. The most critical step is synthesizing this raw data by writing a cohesive narrative. This act of writing forces critical thinking, connects disparate points, and elevates understanding in a way that passive consumption cannot.

Before committing capital, professional investors rigorously challenge their own assumptions. They actively ask, "If I'm wrong, why?" This process of stress-testing an idea helps avoid costly mistakes and strengthens the final thesis.

To avoid emotional decision-making, especially with losing positions, write down the specific criteria for any investment. Then, backtest those rules against historical data. This replaces emotional struggle with a systematic, data-driven process.

Beyond analyzing losing positions (errors of commission), the speaker emphasizes studying mistakes of omission—high-quality businesses he understood but failed to invest in. This reflective practice helps identify flaws in process, time management, or conviction, which can be more instructive for future success than reviewing simple losses.