In an age of rapid AI prototyping, it's easy to jump to solutions without deeply understanding the problem. The act of writing a spec forces product managers to clarify their thinking and structure context. Writing is how PMs "refactor their thoughts" and avoid overfitting to a partially-baked solution.
Related Insights
AI prototyping doesn't replace the PRD; it transforms its purpose. Instead of being a static document, the PRD's rich context and user stories become the ideal 'master prompt' to feed into an AI tool, ensuring the initial design is grounded in strategic requirements.
Traditional "writing-first" cultures create communication gaps and translation errors. With modern AI tools, product managers can now build working prototypes in hours. This "show, don't tell" approach gets ideas validated faster, secures project leadership, and overcomes language and team barriers.
In AI, low prototyping costs and customer uncertainty make the traditional research-first PM model obsolete. The new approach is to build a prototype quickly, show it to customers to discover possibilities, and then iterate based on their reactions, effectively building the solution before the problem is fully defined.
Even for a simple personal project, starting with a Product Requirements Document (PRD) dramatically improves the output from AI code generation tools. Taking a few minutes to outline goals and features provides the necessary context for the AI to produce more accurate and relevant code, saving time on rework.
Product Requirement Documents (PRDs) are often written and then ignored. AI-generated prototypes change this dynamic by serving as powerful internal communication tools. Putting an interactive model in front of engineering and design teams sparks better, more tangible conversations and ideas than a flat document ever could.
Instead of providing a vague functional description, feed prototyping AIs a detailed JSON data model first. This separates data from UI generation, forcing the AI to build a more realistic and higher-quality experience around concrete data, avoiding ambiguity and poor assumptions.
A powerful but unintuitive AI development pattern is to give a model a vague goal and let it attempt a full implementation. This "throwaway" draft, with its mistakes and unexpected choices, provides crucial insights for writing a much more accurate plan for the final version.
Instead of writing detailed Product Requirement Documents (PRDs), use a brief prompt with an AI tool like Vercel's v0. The generated prototype immediately reveals gaps and unstated assumptions in your thinking, allowing you to refine requirements based on the AI's 'misinterpretations' before creating a clearer final spec.
Instead of writing a traditional spec, the product team at Yelp starts by writing an ideal sample conversation between a user and the AI assistant. This "golden conversation" serves as the primary artifact to work backward from, defining the desired user experience before any technical requirements.
Instead of immediately building, engage AI in a Socratic dialogue. Set rules like "ask one question at a time" and "probe assumptions." This structured conversation clarifies the problem and user scenarios, essentially replacing initial team brainstorming sessions and creating a better final prompt for prototyping tools.