Contrary to the popular belief that failing to adopt AI is the biggest risk, some companies may be harming their value by developing AI practices too quickly. The market and client needs may not be ready for advanced AI integration, leading to a misallocation of resources and slower-than-expected returns.

Large enterprises navigate a critical paradox with new technology like AI. Moving too slowly cedes the market and leads to irrelevance. However, moving too quickly without clear direction or a focus on feasibility results in wasting millions of dollars on failed initiatives.

Higgsfield initially saw high adoption for viral, consumer-facing AI features but pivoted. They realized foundation model players like OpenAI will dominate and subsidize these markets. The defensible startup strategy is to ignore consumer virality and solve specific, monetizable B2B workflow problems instead.

When a non-tech firm like Oreo's parent invests a disproportionately large amount of its budget ($40M) on a proprietary AI model, it may indicate a vanity project. This spending is often driven by executives seeking to appear innovative rather than by a sound business case.

The choice between open and closed-source AI is not just technical but strategic. For startups, feeding proprietary data to a closed-source provider like OpenAI, which competes across many verticals, creates long-term risk. Open-source models offer "strategic autonomy" and prevent dependency on a potential future rival.

The initial AI rush for every company to build proprietary models is over. The new winning strategy, seen with firms like Adobe, is to leverage existing product distribution by integrating multiple best-in-class third-party models, enabling faster and more powerful user experiences.

Despite billions in funding, large AI models face a difficult path to profitability. The immense training cost is undercut by competitors creating similar models for a fraction of the price and, more critically, the ability for others to reverse-engineer and extract the weights from existing models, eroding any competitive moat.

Enterprises often default to internal IT teams or large consulting firms for AI projects. These groups typically lack specialized skills and are mired in politics, resulting in failure. This contrasts with the much higher success rate observed when enterprises buy from focused AI startups.

Companies are spending millions on enterprise AI tools not for measurable productivity gains but for "digital transformation" PR. A satirical take highlights a common reality: actual usage is negligible, but made-up metrics create positive investor narratives, making the investment a success in perception, not practice.