When a non-tech firm like Oreo's parent invests a disproportionately large amount of its budget ($40M) on a proprietary AI model, it may indicate a vanity project. This spending is often driven by executives seeking to appear innovative rather than by a sound business case.
Related Insights
Contrary to the popular belief that failing to adopt AI is the biggest risk, some companies may be harming their value by developing AI practices too quickly. The market and client needs may not be ready for advanced AI integration, leading to a misallocation of resources and slower-than-expected returns.
Companies feel immense pressure to integrate AI to stay competitive, leading to massive spending. However, this rush means they lack the infrastructure to measure ROI, creating a paradox of anxious investment without clear proof of value.
Large enterprises navigate a critical paradox with new technology like AI. Moving too slowly cedes the market and leads to irrelevance. However, moving too quickly without clear direction or a focus on feasibility results in wasting millions of dollars on failed initiatives.
Many firms are stuck in "pilot purgatory," launching numerous small, siloed AI tests. While individually successful, these experiments fail to integrate into the broader business system, creating an illusion of progress without delivering strategic, enterprise-level value.
Small firms can outmaneuver large corporations in the AI era by embracing rapid, low-cost experimentation. While enterprises spend millions on specialized PhDs for single use cases, agile companies constantly test new models, learn from failures, and deploy what works to dominate their market.
The current era of broad enterprise AI experimentation will end. The CEO foresees 2026 as a "year of rationalization," where CFO pressure will force companies to consolidate AI tools and cut vendors that fail to demonstrate tangible productivity gains and clear return on investment.
A viral satirical tweet about deploying Microsoft Copilot highlights a common failure mode: companies purchase AI tools to signal innovation but neglect the essential change management, training, and use case development, resulting in near-zero actual usage or ROI.
A satirical take highlights a real trend: large enterprises are rolling out AI tools not for tangible ROI but for "digital transformation" optics. Success is measured with fabricated metrics like "AI enablement" to impress boards and investors, while actual usage remains negligible and productivity gains are unverified.
Companies are spending millions on enterprise AI tools not for measurable productivity gains but for "digital transformation" PR. A satirical take highlights a common reality: actual usage is negligible, but made-up metrics create positive investor narratives, making the investment a success in perception, not practice.
Current AI models suffer from negative unit economics, where costs rise with usage. To justify immense spending despite this, builders pivot from business ROI to "faith-based" arguments about AGI, framing it as an invaluable call option on the future.
