Get your free personalized podcast brief

We scan new podcasts and send you the top 5 insights daily.

The SEC prohibits traditional 20% carry for retail funds but allows a 'fulcrum fee'—a two-way performance fee. Managers can take 20% of the upside only if they also agree to pay for 20% of the downside, creating true financial alignment and reciprocity with investors.

Related Insights

To democratize venture capital, ARK created a fund that eliminates the traditional 20% carried interest (a share of profits). Instead, it charges a flat 2.75% management fee. This structure aims to give retail investors with as little as $500 direct access to premier private company cap tables without the performance fees that typically benefit fund managers disproportionately.

By decoupling bonuses from AUM, the firm removes the incentive for managers to hoard assets for personal gain. This allows leadership to allocate capital optimally across managers based on style and portfolio needs, promoting a culture focused purely on performance.

Unlike traditional VC funds motivated by carry, USVC's fee is based on assets under management. However, because it's a public product with quarterly redemptions, poor performance will lead to investor withdrawals and reputational damage, forcing a focus on strong returns.

Asset managers collect a fixed management fee regardless of performance, ensuring stable revenue. They also earn a large percentage of profits (carried interest), creating immense upside potential. This combination makes it one of the most resilient and profitable business models.

A significant, yet uncommon, sign of an LP-friendly VC is returning a portion of the carry from Special Purpose Vehicles (SPVs) to the original fund's LPs. This acknowledges that the main fund's resources and reputation sourced the follow-on investment opportunity in the first place.

TA's compensation structure aligns partner incentives directly with investor returns. The primary way for partners to increase their ownership (carry) is by generating realized gains—i.e., returning capital to Limited Partners. This systemically prioritizes liquidity and successful exits over simply deploying capital or marking up portfolio value on paper.

To avoid becoming an "asset accumulation business," SLR Capital requires all employees to invest a significant part of their compensation back into the firm's funds. This forces everyone to act as a principal and ask, "Would I personally own this loan?" creating a powerful filter against risky deals.

The 20% performance fee for portfolio managers is justified because their primary challenge is managing money within a strict stop-loss framework. The discipline to cut a losing position, which runs counter to the natural human instinct to buy more on a dip, is a difficult skill that commands high compensation.

To ensure "radical alignment," solo capitalist Oren Zeev pays himself zero from management fees, reinvesting 100% back into his funds. As the largest LP in every fund and with a 30% carry, his entire economic incentive is tied to long-term value creation, not fee generation, which is highly unusual.

The fund's 2.5% annual fee on assets under management (AUM) rewards managers for increasing the fund size, unlike the traditional 20% carry model that rewards high returns. This creates a different incentive structure focused on sales rather than investment success.