Amadeus reinvests heavily in R&D, with a spend equivalent to its #3 competitor's total revenue. This creates a widening technology and product gap that smaller players cannot bridge, fortifying its market leadership and making it increasingly difficult for others to keep up.

There's a strong reluctance in venture capital to fund companies that are number two or three in a category dominated by a "kingmaker"—a startup already backed by a top-tier firm. This creates a powerful, self-fulfilling fundraising moat for the perceived leader, making it unpopular to back competitors.

Trying to win a competitive Series A against a firm like Sequoia is nearly impossible for a smaller fund. Top firms leverage an overwhelming arsenal of social proof, including board seats at the world's most valuable companies and references from iconic founders, creating an insurmountable competitive moat.

Unlike traditional SaaS where a bootstrapped company could eventually catch up to funded rivals, the AI landscape is different. The high, ongoing cost of talent and compute means an early capital advantage becomes a permanent, widening moat, making it nearly impossible for capital-light players to compete.

In the hybrid capital market, the ability to deploy capital at scale is a significant competitive advantage. While many firms can handle smaller $20-40 million deals, very few can quickly underwrite and commit to a $500+ million transaction. This scarcity of scaled players creates a less competitive, inefficient market for those who can operate at that level.

For startups experiencing hyper-growth, the optimal strategy is to raise capital aggressively and frequently—even multiple times a year—regardless of current cash reserves. This builds a war chest, solidifies a high valuation based on momentum, and effectively starves less explosive competitors of investor attention and capital.

While massive "kingmaking" funding rounds can accelerate growth, they don't guarantee victory. A superior product can still triumph over a capital-rich but less-efficient competitor, as seen in the DoorDash vs. Uber Eats battle. Capital can create inefficiency and unforced errors.

Drawing from Verkada's decision to build its own hardware, the strategy is to intentionally tackle difficult, foundational challenges early on. While this requires more upfront investment and delays initial traction, it creates an immense competitive barrier that latecomers will struggle to overcome.

The "Capital River" is a concept where one or two companies in a category gain unstoppable momentum. Once "in the river," they attract a disproportionate share of capital, top-tier talent, and high-quality customers, creating a powerful, self-reinforcing flywheel that helps them dominate.