A program like Israel's mandatory service provides structure, teaches skills, fosters competence, and reduces discrimination through forced cooperation. It could disproportionately benefit young men who are often not ready for the unstructured environment of college at age 18.
Curtis Sliwa argues that true masculinity isn't defined by symbols of power like guns but by a commitment to protecting the vulnerable—the poor, elderly, and infirm. He frames it as a moral responsibility to risk one's life for strangers, a form of humanitarian service that stands in stark contrast to conventional notions of strength.
Current fiscal policies represent a massive wealth transfer from young to old. Framing national service as a direct, large-scale investment in youth counteracts this economic imbalance, shifting national priorities and resources back to the next generation, effectively fighting a 'generational war' through policy.
Forcing children to do difficult, undesirable manual labor from a young age builds foundational character and discipline that pays dividends in later life. While they will hate it at the time, this 'character building' instills a level of resilience that modern children often lack.
When raising boys, a father's actions are far more impactful than his words. Instead of lecturing on what it means to be a man, consistently demonstrating service, respect, and responsibility will be internalized by a son over time, even if the lesson isn't explicit or is initially met with embarrassment.
National service offers a structured "gap year" for boys, whose emotional maturity often lags their development. It acts as a "societal take-two," providing a second chance to mature and find direction without immediate academic or career pressures, specifically addressing a cohort in crisis.
Ancient societies universally used rites of passage—difficult, often dangerous, solitary journeys—to transition youth into adulthood. These trials forced them to confront failure and discover their capability, fostering a confidence and competence that modern society struggles to instill without such structured challenges.
Unlike many cultures, modern America lacks a defining moment that marks a boy's transition into manhood. This cultural void can lead to confusion. Historically, institutions like the military or intentional acts by fathers served this purpose, but their decline has left a developmental gap.
A key reason for past legislative success was that leaders shared a common identity forged in military service. Reinstating mandatory national service could create 'connective tissue' among diverse young people, fostering a unified identity as citizens first and foremost, before individual identity groups.
Manhood isn't an age but a state of being generative: producing more jobs, love, and care than you consume. This reframes masculinity around contribution rather than status or age, offering a clear, actionable goal for young men to strive for.
The struggles and pathologies seen in young men are not just an isolated gender issue. They are a leading indicator that the broader societal belief in upward mobility—'we can all do well'—is eroding. This group is the first to react when reliable paths to success seem blocked.