When hiring, top firms like McKinsey value a candidate's ability to articulate a deliberate, logical problem-solving process as much as their past successes. Having a structured method shows you can reliably tackle novel challenges, whereas simply pointing to past wins might suggest luck or context-specific success.

Public company boards often hire CEOs using fuzzy adjectives like 'leader.' A better method is to first define 3-5 key strategic goals, creating a 'scorecard of success,' and then find a candidate whose track record specifically matches those objectives.

Senior leaders now value candidates who ask excellent questions and are eager to solve problems over those who act like they know everything. This represents a significant shift from valuing 'knowers' to valuing 'learners' in the workplace.

To move from execution to strategy, stop waiting for permission or a promotion. Proactively demonstrate strategic thinking in your current role. Instead of just reporting what you did, frame your updates as "This is what I think we should do and why."

If an interview feels easy because you are exclusively discussing your deep functional expertise, you are likely failing. Boards hire "T-shaped" directors who can connect specialized knowledge to broad strategic issues. You must resist going too deep and instead demonstrate wide-ranging strategic thinking.

Instead of guessing a nominating committee's priorities, ask them directly. A powerful question is, "What was it about my background that made you want to interview me?" Their answer provides a cheat sheet to their key criteria, allowing you to tailor your responses to what they truly value.

Boards often default to replacing outgoing members with identical profiles, like a former CEO. An effective search professional must have the "intestinal fortitude" to challenge this, analyze the board's future strategic gaps, and propose candidates who fill those specific needs, which naturally surfaces more diverse talent.

For high-level leadership roles, skip hypothetical case studies. Instead, present candidates with your company's actual, current problems. The worst-case scenario is free, high-quality consulting. The best case is finding someone who can not only devise a solution but also implement it, making the interview process far more valuable.

Ineffective interviews try to catch candidates failing. A better approach models a collaborative rally: see how they handle challenging questions and if they can return the ball effectively. The goal is to simulate real-world problem-solving, not just grill them under pressure.