Hitting a ceiling on a winner-take-all platform like Amazon, where ad spend yields diminishing returns, often signals a product problem. The top competitor isn't just out-marketing you; they likely have a fundamentally better product that converts more effectively, giving them superior unit economics.

Related Insights

When a business gets high visibility but low conversions, the impulse is to blame the platform or marketing tactic (the 'sink'). However, the real issue is often the core offering—the product, pricing, or value proposition (the 'well'). People obsess over front-end fixes when the back-end is the actual problem.

Many businesses reach a million in revenue through sheer effort but then stall. The shift to scaling requires achieving product-market fit, which creates leverage and pulls in customers, leading to exponential profitability instead of diminishing returns from just pushing harder.

Many marketers mistakenly assume performance marketing channels scale linearly. Co-founder Andy Lambert learned that simply increasing the budget doesn't produce proportional results. Instead, efficiency breaks down, and customer acquisition costs rise, highlighting an over-fixation on demand capture versus sustainable demand creation.

In a competitive landscape, the winning long-term play isn't a marketing land-grab. The founder of Simple AI argues for focusing relentlessly on building the best-in-class product, as sophisticated buyers will compare options and choose the superior technology.

Many marketing failures aren't the marketer's fault, but a result of joining a company that lacks true product-market fit. Marketers excel at scaling demand for something with proven value, not creating demand for a vague idea. It's crucial to verify PMF before accepting a role.

Technical founders often mistakenly believe the best product wins. In reality, marketing and sales acumen are more critical for success. Many multi-million dollar companies have succeeded with products considered clunky or complex, purely through superior distribution and sales execution.

When ad performance breaks at scale, the problem isn't your bidding strategy; it's that you've saturated the 3% of the market ready to buy now. To grow, you must target the other 97% with broader, less direct hooks and lead magnets that educate them first.

When ad spend can't increase without performance dropping, the issue isn't your bidding strategy. It's that your direct offers have exhausted the small pool of problem/solution-aware customers. Scaling requires broader hooks and funnels to engage the much larger, less-aware audience.

When entrepreneurs fail to scale, they often blame a saturated market. In reality, they've likely only reached a tiny fraction of potential customers. The real issue is their inability to advertise effectively to audiences with different levels of problem and solution awareness.

Marketers often equate effectiveness with ad ROI, but communications typically drive only 10% of sales. The other 90% is influenced by levers like pricing, distribution, and product performance. True marketing effectiveness requires a holistic view across all these business areas, not just advertising.