High-profile data acquisitions by AI labs, like OpenAI's with the NYT, may be less about the data's intrinsic value and more about securing positive press. A $20 million deal can be a cheap price for incredible media coverage, effectively a bribe for favorable narratives.
Related Insights
CNN's partnership with Kalshi introduces a significant ethical risk. While prediction markets can offer data-driven insights, their integration into mainstream news creates a feedback loop where actors can manipulate markets with relatively small sums of money to generate favorable headlines and influence political outcomes.
The NYT's seemingly contradictory AI strategy is a deliberate two-pronged approach. Lawsuits enforce intellectual property rights and prevent unauthorized scraping, while licensing deals demonstrate a clear, sustainable market and fair value exchange for its journalism.
Medium's CEO revealed the company providing data for a critical Wired article about "AI slop" was simultaneously trying to sell its AI detection services to Medium. This highlights a potential conflict of interest where a data source may benefit directly from negative press about a target company.
There is emerging evidence of a "pay-to-play" dynamic in AI search. Platforms like ChatGPT seem to disproportionately cite content from sources with which they have commercial deals, such as the Financial Times and Reddit. This suggests paid partnerships can heavily influence visibility in AI-generated results.
Sam Altman's announcements of massive deals, like a $300B Oracle agreement, aren't just about operational needs. They are strategic narratives designed to signal immense future growth and justify a trillion-dollar valuation to retail investors in an upcoming IPO.
Companies like Amazon are seeing massive market cap increases (e.g., $150B) from announcing large deals with OpenAI ($38B). This highlights a "press release economy" where the announcement itself creates immense value, even if the underlying financial commitments are not fully binding or guaranteed.
The AI industry operates in a "press release economy" where mindshare is critical. Competitors strategically time major news, like Anthropic's massive valuation, to coincide with a rival's launch (Google's Gemini 3) to dilute media impact and ensure they remain part of the conversation.
OpenAI's publicly stated plan to spend $1.4 trillion on AI infrastructure is likely a strategic "psyop" or psychological operation. By announcing an unbelievably large number, they aim to discourage competitors like xAI, Microsoft, or Apple from even trying to compete, framing the capital required as insurmountable.
The high-stakes competition for AI dominance is so intense that investigative journalism can trigger immediate, massive corporate action. A report in The Information about OpenAI exploring Google's TPUs directly prompted NVIDIA's CEO to call OpenAI's CEO and strike a major investment deal to secure the business.
Companies are spending millions on enterprise AI tools not for measurable productivity gains but for "digital transformation" PR. A satirical take highlights a common reality: actual usage is negligible, but made-up metrics create positive investor narratives, making the investment a success in perception, not practice.
