A powerful workflow involves using multiple MCPs in a single AI chat. For example, a PM can ask Claude to pull requirements from a Confluence page and then compare them directly against a specific Figma design frame. The AI performs a gap analysis, catching discrepancies that are often missed during manual reviews.
Instead of switching between ChatGPT, Claude, and others, a multi-agent workflow lets users prompt once to receive and compare outputs from several LLMs simultaneously. This consolidates the AI user experience, saving time and eliminating 'LLM ping pong' to find the best response.
Instead of prompting a specialized AI tool directly, experts employ a meta-workflow. They first use a general LLM like ChatGPT or Claude to generate a detailed, context-rich 'master prompt' based on a PRD or user story, which they then paste into the specialized tool for superior results.
For large projects, use a high-level AI (like Claude's Mac app) as a strategic partner to break down the work and write prompts for a code-execution AI (like Conductor). This 'CTO' AI can then evaluate the generated code, creating a powerful, multi-layered workflow for complex development.
Go beyond using Claude Projects for just knowledge retrieval. A power-user technique is to load them with detailed, sequential instructions on how specific MCP tools should be used in a workflow, dramatically improving the agent's reliability and output quality.
Use Claude's "Artifacts" feature to generate interactive, LLM-powered application prototypes directly from a prompt. This allows product managers to test the feel and flow of a conversational AI, including latency and response length, without needing API keys or engineering support, bridging the gap between a static mock and a coded MVP.
AI developer environments with Model Context Protocols (MCPs) create a unified workspace for data analysis. An analyst can investigate code in GitHub, write and execute SQL against Snowflake, read a BI dashboard, and draft a Notion summary—all without leaving their editor, eliminating context switching.
Instead of holding context for multiple projects in their heads, PMs create separate, fully-loaded AI agents (in Claude or ChatGPT) for each initiative. These "brains" are fed with all relevant files and instructions, allowing the PM to instantly get up to speed and work more efficiently.
Instead of jumping between apps, top PMs use a central tool like Claude Desktop or Cursor as a 'home base.' They connect it to other services (Jira, GitHub, Sanity) via MCPs, allowing them to perform tasks and retrieve information without breaking their flow state.
Instead of relying on a single, all-purpose coding agent, the most effective workflow involves using different agents for their specific strengths. For example, using the 'Friday' agent for UI tasks, 'Charlie' for code reviews, and 'Claude Code' for research and backend logic.
Define different agents (e.g., Designer, Engineer, Executive) with unique instructions and perspectives, then task them with reviewing a document in parallel. This generates diverse, structured feedback that mimics a real-world team review, surfacing potential issues from multiple viewpoints simultaneously.