The Chinese government's intense desire for technological self-sufficiency and global leadership paradoxically reduces investment risk. Beijing now "desperately" needs its deep science companies to succeed, making another unpredictable, Jack Ma-style crackdown on the industry less likely than in previous years.

Semiconductor equipment makers like ASML are largely shielded from China-specific export controls. Their business is driven by total global demand for chips, not the location of production. A fab not built in China due to sanctions will simply be built elsewhere, leading to a substitution effect where the equipment sale still occurs.

China's pause on Nvidia H200 chip orders is not a permanent ban but a strategic move. The government aims to balance its immediate need for advanced AI chips with its long-term goal of fostering a competitive homegrown chip industry, preventing over-reliance on Western technology.

China offers a hyper-concentrated manufacturing ecosystem where suppliers are neighbors, supported by world-class infrastructure. This dramatically speeds up prototyping and production, turning complex international logistics into a simple "walk down the street."

Despite the U.S. easing export controls, China's government may restrict imports of NVIDIA's advanced chips. Beijing is prioritizing its long-term goal of semiconductor self-sufficiency, which requires creating a protected market for domestic firms like Huawei, even if Chinese tech companies prefer superior foreign hardware.

Instead of crippling China, aggressive US sanctions and tech restrictions are having the opposite effect. They have forced China to accelerate its own domestic R&D and manufacturing for advanced technologies like microchips. This is creating a more powerful and self-sufficient competitor that will not be reliant on the West.

While headlines focus on advanced chips, China’s real leverage comes from its strategic control over less glamorous but essential upstream inputs like rare earths and magnets. It has even banned the export of magnet-making technology, creating critical, hard-to-solve bottlenecks for Western manufacturing.

The Nexperia dispute reveals China's strategic leverage. By controlling the supply of mid-tech chips for basic car functions like airbags and windows, Beijing can cripple major European automakers, demonstrating its influence over global supply chains beyond just high-end tech.

China's semiconductor strategy is not merely to reverse-engineer Western technology like ASML's. It's a well-funded "primacy race" to develop novel, AI-driven lithography systems. This approach aims to create superior, not just parallel, manufacturing capabilities to gain global economic leverage.