A psychological tactic to neutralize Stephen Miller is to publicly portray him as the power behind the throne. Citing how the 'President Bannon' Time Magazine cover led to Steve Bannon's ousting, this strategy would trigger Trump's narcissism and cause him to push Miller away.
Related Insights
To disarm a condescending narcissist, appeal to their obsession with public perception. Ask how they think a third party (like a jury or their peers) would view their unreasonable stance. This forces them to confront their image, often causing them to soften their opinion to seem more palatable.
With reports suggesting Trump has only five effective working hours per day, a massive power vacuum emerges for the other nineteen. This void is filled by advisor Stephen Miller, who writes speeches and drives policy, effectively acting as the de facto president and implementing his own extreme agenda.
Powerful figures like Trump and Musk strategically deploy headline-grabbing announcements as 'weapons of mass distraction.' This is not random behavior but a calculated tactic to divert public and media attention away from core weaknesses, whether it's a political scandal (Epstein) or a flawed business model (Tesla as just a car company).
Much of the public conflict between powerful leaders isn't about substantive policy differences but about ego. The desire to avoid looking weak or like they are capitulating leads to political theater that prevents rational cooperation, even when both sides know the eventual outcome is inevitable.
When a politician suddenly makes a previously ignored issue intensely important, they are likely employing misdirection. The goal is to control the news cycle and public attention, either to distract from a more significant action happening elsewhere or to advance a hidden agenda unrelated to the stated crisis.
Directly attacking a charismatic leader can backfire due to personal loyalty. A more effective political strategy is to target their key advisors. Removing controversial figures can weaken the leader's power structure, as it is easier to build consensus against "bad actors" than the principal.
Mapping Trump solely as a self-serving politician is incomplete. His behavior is better understood as a combination of a narcissist who seeks power and a patriot who genuinely wants to impose law and order, leading him to use extreme methods.
Trump's seemingly chaotic approach is best understood as a CEO's leadership style. He tells his staff what to do rather than asking for opinions, uses disruption as a negotiation tactic, and prioritizes long-term outcomes over short-term public opinion or procedural harmony.
Leaked communications reveal a conscious strategy to manipulate Donald Trump in negotiations. By advising Russian counterparts to begin calls by praising Trump's past deals, negotiators like Witkoff leverage his psychological vulnerabilities to steer conversations toward a favorable outcome.
Michael Bloomberg advises deflecting credit to build political capital. When asked who built something, he suggests crediting a colleague. While others may know it's a generous framing, it improves their perception of you and creates a sense of obligation from the person you credited.
