Get your free personalized podcast brief

We scan new podcasts and send you the top 5 insights daily.

Data from a novel Nectin-4 ADC trial showed zero responses in patients with prior topoisomerase therapy. This strongly suggests that payload resistance, not just the ADC target, is a critical mechanism that will dictate future treatment sequencing.

Related Insights

Early clinical trial data suggests that topoisomerase-1 payload ADCs retain efficacy in patients previously treated with mirvetuximab. Because mirvetuximab has a different cytotoxic payload, this indicates that targeting the same receptor (FR-alpha) with a different type of toxin is a viable sequencing strategy.

A "tsunami" of antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) are in development for ovarian cancer, but many share the same TOP1 inhibitor payload. This creates a significant future clinical challenge: after a patient progresses on one such ADC, it is unknown if another with the same payload will be effective, creating an urgent need for sequencing data.

When sequencing antibody-drug conjugates, clinical experience suggests that resistance to the chemotherapy payload is a primary driver of failure. Therefore, oncologists tend to avoid using another ADC with the same payload consecutively, preferring to switch both target and payload if possible.

The primary reason Antibody-Drug Conjugates (ADCs) stop working is payload resistance, a shift from the traditional belief that failure stems from tumors losing the target antigen. This insight drives development of multi-payload ADCs to overcome this resistance mechanism.

Experts question the efficacy of sequencing ADCs like EV (Nectin-4 target) and DV (HER2 target) because they share the same MMAE chemo payload. Since resistance is often tied to the payload, not the target antibody, switching targets may not overcome resistance, though anecdotal responses have been observed.

When planning treatment for patients who will receive multiple antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs), the prevailing clinical strategy is to focus on alternating the drug's payload (e.g., a tubulin inhibitor vs. a topoisomerase I inhibitor). This approach is believed to be more effective at overcoming resistance than alternating the cell-surface target.

When sequencing antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) for SCLC, resistance may be driven more by the cytotoxic payload (e.g., a topoisomerase 1 inhibitor) than the antibody's target antigen. This suggests prior exposure to a similar payload class could predict non-response, even when using an ADC with a different target.

A next-generation Nectin-4 targeting ADC demonstrated a 33% response rate in patients who had already progressed on enfortumab vedotin (EV). This indicates that Nectin-4 remains a viable therapeutic target post-EV, suggesting resistance is not always due to target loss.

Most new antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) for ovarian cancer use the same topoisomerase-1 (Topo1) inhibitor payload. This similarity will likely prevent their sequential use due to cross-resistance, forcing clinicians into a "one-shot" scenario where they must choose the single best Topo1-based ADC upfront for a patient.

An antibody-drug conjugate's (ADC) effectiveness is capped by its chemotherapy payload. In prostate cancer, topoisomerase inhibitors have a poor track record. Therefore, ADCs using this payload face an uphill battle compared to those with proven payloads like microtubule inhibitors (taxanes).

Prior Topoisomerase Inhibitor Therapy May Preclude Response to New Topo-1 Payload ADCs | RiffOn