Politicians will continue running large deficits as long as the bond market tolerates it by keeping interest rates low. The ultimate correcting mechanism for government spending isn't political discipline, but the bond market's impersonal decision to raise rates, forcing fiscal responsibility.
Related Insights
While politicians can ignore massive fraud to maintain patronage systems, the financial markets will not. As the scale of waste in states like Minnesota and California becomes clear, bond investors will reprice the risk of municipal bonds, potentially triggering a fiscal crisis that forces accountability where political will has failed.
The Federal Reserve faces "fiscal dominance," where government debt dictates monetary policy. With a massive amount of US debt maturing in 2026, the Fed will be forced to lower interest rates to make refinancing manageable, regardless of other economic indicators. The alternative is national insolvency.
Politicians choose rate cuts because balancing the budget is politically unpopular and would trigger an immediate economic crisis. By lowering rates, they can "kick the can down the road," making massive government debt refinancing manageable. This intentionally fuels an "everything bubble" in assets as a preferable alternative to politically unpalatable fiscal responsibility.
A new market dynamic has emerged where Fed rate cuts cause long-term bond yields to rise, breaking historical patterns. This anomaly is driven by investor concerns over fiscal imbalances and high national debt, meaning monetary easing no longer has its traditional effect on the back end of the yield curve.
Under "fiscal dominance," the U.S. government's massive debt dictates Federal Reserve policy. The Fed must keep rates low enough for the government to afford interest payments, even if it fuels inflation. Monetary policy is no longer about managing the economy but about preventing a debt-driven collapse, making the Fed reactive, not proactive.
The 2022 UK "mini-budget" crisis serves as a stark example of market power. When the government proposed unfunded tax cuts, the bond market reacted instantly and violently, forcing a rapid policy U-turn. This proves that bond markets serve as a powerful disciplinary force against governments pursuing unsustainable fiscal policies.
Investors seek a sweet spot where government fiscal laxity is high enough to generate attractive yield premiums but not so extreme that it threatens the system's viability. This creates a market for lending to slightly imperfect, high-quality credits.
The U.S. government's debt is so large that the Federal Reserve is trapped. Raising interest rates would trigger a government default, while cutting them would further inflate the 'everything bubble.' Either path leads to a systemic crisis, a situation economists call 'fiscal dominance.'
In periods of 'fiscal dominance,' where government debt and deficits are high, a central bank's independence inevitably erodes. Its primary function shifts from controlling inflation to ensuring the government can finance its spending, often through financial repression like yield curve control.
Unlike the US, emerging markets are constrained by financial markets. If they let their fiscal balance deteriorate, markets punish their currency, triggering a vicious cycle of inflation and higher interest rates. This threat serves as a natural check on government spending, enforcing a level of fiscal responsibility.
