The act of lifting sanctions on Iran is sold as a clever tactic to "use their oil against them." In reality, it's a pragmatic move to control domestic gas prices, highlighting the gap between political rhetoric and the underlying economic drivers.

Fears of a US-Iran conflict disrupting oil flows are overstated. Any potential US military action would likely be designed to be 'surgical' to specifically avoid Iran's oil infrastructure, as the administration's priority is preventing economic shocks and energy price hikes ahead of elections.

US actions that disrupt Iran's official oil exports also drive up global prices. This creates a bonanza for smugglers, especially IRGC-linked groups, who can buy subsidized domestic oil and sell it illicitly at a huge premium, thus undermining the entire economic pressure campaign.

Before the crisis, US pressure had halved India's imports of Russian crude. The Hormuz shutdown forces India and others to seek alternative supplies, making Russian oil essential again. This geopolitical turmoil has made Moscow its single greatest beneficiary, even prompting sanctions waivers from the White House.

In a counter-intuitive twist, Iran is the primary beneficiary of the oil disruption it helped create. While rivals like Saudi Arabia have had to shut in production because they cannot export, Iran continues to export its oil, weakening its financial incentive to de-escalate the conflict.

Beyond geopolitics, transforming Iran into a stable, pro-West trading partner could unlock vast oil and gas reserves and unleash entrepreneurial talent. This would stabilize global energy prices, providing an economic upside that is a powerful, often overlooked, aspect of the conflict.

Despite his stated goal of lowering oil prices, President Trump's aggressive sanctions on Venezuela, Iran, and Russia have removed significant supply from the market. This creates logistical bottlenecks and "oil on water" buildups, effectively tightening the market and keeping prices higher than they would be otherwise.

US sanctions on Russian LNG facilities are not primarily about punishing Russia for Ukraine, but are a strategic move in a global "LNG war." The US is using LNG as a tool of foreign policy and national security, meaning these sanctions are unlikely to be lifted even with a peace deal.

U.S. foreign policy actions against Venezuela and Iran are not primarily about democracy but are strategic moves to disrupt the flow of cheap, sanctioned oil to China. By controlling these sources, the U.S. can directly attack a key adversary's economic and military engine.