Get your free personalized podcast brief

We scan new podcasts and send you the top 5 insights daily.

AI agents that use text for proactive outreach, like Instinct's shopping suggestions, face a significant platform risk. If messaging apps like iMessage filter them into 'Promotions' folders, they lose their primary advantage of high-visibility, personal communication. This mirrors the 'newsletter apocalypse' that occurred with Gmail's filtering.

Related Insights

OpenAI faced significant user backlash for testing app suggestions that looked like ads in its paid ChatGPT Pro plan. This reaction shows that users of premium AI tools expect an ad-free, utility-focused experience. Violating this expectation, even unintentionally, risks alienating the core user base and damaging brand trust.

The massive increase in low-quality, AI-generated prospecting emails has conditioned buyers to ignore all outreach, even legitimate, personalized messages. This volume has eroded the efficiency gains the technology promised, making it harder for everyone to break through.

A new class of consumer AI assistants, like Instinct, operate with such aggressive relentlessness to achieve user goals (e.g., booking a restaurant) that they violate platforms' terms of service. This automated spamming behavior creates a new challenge for platforms and can lead to unintended consequences like user bans.

AI agents using free consumer services like Gmail for tasks will inevitably get banned for bot-like activity. This creates a clear market opportunity for API-first infrastructure built specifically for agents, such as AgentMail, which provides a reliable, stateful email service that won't be shut down.

Marketers should not view the promotions tab as a penalty. Email providers like Gmail are correctly categorizing marketing content where users expect to find it. Trying to game the system to get a promotional email into the primary inbox goes against user expectations and the provider's goal of a clean, organized inbox.

Even though buyers have budgets for and are actively seeking AI-enabled solutions, including the term "AI" or other industry buzzwords in your cold outreach has a significant negative impact on reply rates. It immediately flags the email as generic marketing spam, undermining personalization efforts. Focus on the problem and outcome, not the technology buzzword.

To improve response rates and avoid being marked as spam when conducting mass SMS outreach, use AI. Feed your contact list to an AI agent to find personalized information for each person. Then, have the AI generate a unique first message for each contact based on a template, making each text appear unique to carriers.

AI makes it easy to generate grammatically correct but generic outreach. This flood of 'mediocre' communication, rather than 'terrible' spam, makes it harder for genuine, well-researched messages to stand out. Success now requires a level of personalization that generic AI can't fake.

History shows marketers often ruin new channels (email, SMS) by overwhelming them with low-quality 'spam.' The immediate push to monetize the agent channel could create a similar 'arms race' of spam-bots and anti-spam agents, eroding consumer trust and killing the channel's potential.

AI agents like Instinct that send product suggestions via text risk being automatically filtered into 'Promotions' folders by mobile operating systems. This move from a trusted personal messenger to a marketing channel could tank engagement rates, similar to what happened to newsletters filtered out of the primary Gmail inbox.