Increased market volatility raises the Value at Risk (VAR) for trading positions. For systematic funds like CTAs that use VAR-based position sizing, this can automatically force them to reduce holdings to maintain risk targets, adding selling pressure that is independent of fundamental views.
A basic trend-following system for gold—buying only when it reaches a new all-time high and selling after a modest pullback—historically outperforms a passive buy-and-hold approach. This counterintuitive finding suggests that for certain volatile assets, systematic momentum strategies can be more effective than passive ownership, capturing upside while managing downside risk.
Gold's price is rising alongside risk assets and falling during stress events, a reversal of its historical role. This behavior mirrors speculative assets like Bitcoin, suggesting its recent rally is driven by momentum and bandwagon effects, not a fundamental flight from fiat currency debasement.
Programmed strategies from systematic funds, which delever when volatility (VIX) rises and relever when it falls, are the primary drivers of short-term market action. These automated flows, along with pension rebalancing, have more impact than traditional earnings or economic data, especially in low-liquidity holiday periods.
Gold's current volatility has only been matched twice in 30 years: during the 2008 GFC and the 2020 pandemic. This indicates the market is not merely hedging inflation but is actively pricing in a generational, systemic crisis not yet reflected in equities or credit.
Foreign central banks, the Fed, and commercial banks—buyers who are insensitive to price—are shrinking their share of the Treasury market. This forces price-sensitive investors to absorb a massive supply of new debt, structurally increasing bond volatility and pushing institutions to adopt gold as a more reliable portfolio diversifier.
When a small, speculative investment like crypto appreciates massively, it can unbalance an entire portfolio by becoming an oversized allocation. This 'good problem' forces investors to systematically sell the high-performing asset to manage risk, even as it continues to grow.
Despite a massive single-day drop, the long-term bullish case for gold remains intact. The pullback is viewed as a normal de-risking event within a larger structural trend of diversification by central banks, leading to a "ratchet-like" price formation over time.
In markets dominated by passive funds with low float, retail investors can create significant volatility by piling into call options in specific sectors. This collective action creates "synthetic gamma squeezes" as dealers hedge their positions, making positioning more important than fundamentals for short-term price moves.
Investors hesitant to buy assets like gold near all-time highs can use trend following for exposure. The strategy systematically enters prevailing trends and, crucially, provides a built-in, non-emotional exit signal when the trend reverses, mitigating timing risk.
To survive long-term, systematic trading models should be designed to be more sensitive when exiting a trade than when entering. Avoiding a leveraged liquidity cascade by selling near the top is far more critical for capital preservation than buying the exact bottom.