Get your free personalized podcast brief

We scan new podcasts and send you the top 5 insights daily.

Before any technical work begins, a lab must decide whether to build a custom data solution or purchase a vendor tool. This choice hinges on anticipating future growth and changing needs, even when those needs are not fully clear at the outset.

Related Insights

The pace of technological advancement is so rapid that any new digital system is effectively outdated the moment it is implemented. Success depends not on creating a perfect, final solution, but on building an adaptable framework and embracing continuous change management.

The build-vs-buy decision for AI tools hinges on risk and scale. Opt to "buy" when dealing with customer data, complex approval governance, or security requirements, as established vendors provide necessary certifications and support. "Build" is better for internal, specific use cases where speed and customization are paramount and data is not sensitive.

When deciding to build or buy, the key factor is strategic importance. Never cede control of technology that is core to your unique value proposition to a vendor. Reserve outsourcing for necessary but commoditized functions that don't differentiate you in the market.

Before engaging external partners, decide your tech strategy. 'Build' in-house for a core competitive advantage. 'Buy' off-the-shelf enterprise solutions for broad utility. 'Borrow' expertise from agencies for specialized projects where you want to upskill your team.

The opportunity cost of building custom internal AI can be massive. By the time a multi-million dollar project is complete, off-the-shelf tools like ChatGPT are often far more capable, dynamic, and cost-effective, rendering the custom solution outdated on arrival.

Traditional "flexible" lab design pre-engineers for every possible future scenario, which is expensive and rigid. A smarter approach is "adaptability": consciously designing pathways and leaving space for future technology without over-investing in systems that may quickly become obsolete.

The traditional wisdom to "build what's core" to your business is becoming obsolete for AI. The immense cost and rapid advancement of foundational models by major labs mean most companies are better off buying or partnering for core AI capabilities rather than attempting to build them in-house.

When deciding whether to build or buy an AI tool, purchase stable, undifferentiated infrastructure (like a dialer). In-house resources should focus on building proprietary intelligence that creates a unique competitive advantage, such as a custom pre-call research model tailored to your specific customer profile.

For AI projects, decide whether to buy or build using a 2x2 matrix plotting business differentiation against implementation complexity. You should build projects that are highly differentiating but complex. Conversely, you should buy solutions that have low-differentiation and low-complexity.

Forgo building custom AI tools for common problems. Instead, purchase 90% of your AI stack from specialized vendors. Reserve your in-house engineering resources for the critical 10% of tasks that are unique to your business and for which no adequate third-party solution exists.

A Lab's First Digital Transformation Decision Is "Build vs. Buy," Factoring in Unknown Future Scale | RiffOn