The Trump administration reveals that governance is less about ideology and more about high-stakes transactions. Success in politics, much like a game of 'money chess,' comes from identifying and trading for what each party desires—be it money, oil, or influence. This transactional nature of power is far more pervasive than many believe.

Analyzing the Trump administration requires understanding the individual motives of figures like Marco Rubio, not a unified state policy. Trump's foreign relations are based on personal chemistry with leaders like Milei or Bukele, creating a non-transferable, unpredictable policy that lacks long-term strategic direction for future presidents.

Unlike predecessors who framed foreign policy within a broader worldview (e.g., democracy promotion), Trump's approach is purely transactional and theatrical. It lacks a moral or ideological justification, instead focusing on demanding tribute, like oil from Venezuela, to appeal to a nationalist base without building a durable governing coalition.

Anne Applebaum argues that certain leaders don't analyze geopolitical issues by what benefits the nation, but by how they personally emerge as a 'winner.' This transforms complex diplomacy into a quest for applause and personal validation, rather than strategic problem-solving.

To predict a leader's actions, disregard their words and even individual actions. Instead, focus on their consistent, long-term pattern of behavior. For Putin, the pattern is using negotiations as a stalling tactic to advance a fixed agenda, making him an unreliable partner for peace deals based on stated intentions.

Stephen Walt defines Trump's foreign policy as 'predatory hegemony,' a unique strategy where a dominant power uses its leverage to extract concessions and tribute from everyone, including long-standing allies. This departs from traditional great power politics, which is typically predatory only toward rivals.

Traditional international relations theories assuming rational state actors are less predictive in an era dominated by individual leaders like Putin, Trump, and Xi. Their decisions are often driven by personal psychology and political survival, making outcomes highly unpredictable and distinct from state-level interests.

Leaked communications reveal a conscious strategy to manipulate Donald Trump in negotiations. By advising Russian counterparts to begin calls by praising Trump's past deals, negotiators like Witkoff leverage his psychological vulnerabilities to steer conversations toward a favorable outcome.

Anne Applebaum highlights a disturbing shift where high-stakes foreign policy, like the Ukraine peace plan, is conducted by businesspeople seeking personal financial gain. This mirrors the kleptocratic systems of autocratic states, prioritizing private profit over national or allied interests, and raises questions about who American foreign policy truly serves.