While platforms like LinkedIn DMs or text messages are common, they are ineffective for introduction requests. They are not designed to be professionally forwarded, making the connector's job difficult or impossible. Email is the only medium that supports the seamless, double opt-in intro process.

Related Insights

Reframe your networking requests. Asking for a "referral" implies a strong endorsement and makes people uncomfortable. Asking for an "introduction" is a lower-stakes request that is much easier for your contacts to fulfill, dramatically increasing your chances of success.

LinkedIn is not a prospecting panacea that provides effortless inbound leads. Its true power is unlocked when it's integrated into a structured, multi-channel sequence, where it amplifies the impact of traditional outreach like phone calls and emails rather than replacing them.

Deciding between email and a face-to-face conversation for a tough message isn't about what's easiest for you. The choice should be a strategic one based on the desired relational outcome. Use email for transactional updates; use direct conversation to preserve relationships.

Using phone, email, and social isn't merely about finding a channel that works; it's about becoming a known person. When a prospect has heard your voice on a voicemail and seen your face on LinkedIn, you are no longer an anonymous bot. This human connection dramatically increases the likelihood of a response, even if it's a polite 'no'.

When an introduction request goes unanswered, it is acceptable to send only one polite follow-up. Sending more than one crosses the line from professional persistence to desperation, which damages your relationship with the connector and violates the respectful spirit of the double opt-in process.

The person requesting the introduction is the 'pursuer,' not the 'prize.' Sending your Calendly link first subtly implies the target should conform to your schedule. Instead, propose specific times manually to demonstrate flexibility and respect for their time. Let them offer their own scheduling tool.

An introduction will fail if it's based solely on what the asker wants. The request must clearly articulate a compelling benefit for the target. Merely admiring someone is not a valid reason, as it asks the connector to burn their social capital for a one-sided benefit.

When conducting cold outreach to hiring managers or other employees, your primary call-to-action should not be a request for a meeting. Instead, make the ask a low-lift action: 'Please forward this resume to your recruiting partner.' This drastically increases the likelihood of reaching the right person.

Effective cold outreach avoids long life stories and unsolicited attachments. The optimal formula is: 1) a single sentence on how you can help them, 2) one or two quantified achievements (bona fides), and 3) a link to your polished LinkedIn profile. This respects the recipient's time and piques their curiosity.

The initial request email must be a self-contained, easily forwardable tool that makes the connector look good and requires zero extra work. This reframes the task from merely asking a favor to providing the connector with a valuable networking opportunity they can easily share.

Use Email Exclusively for Intro Requests; Other Platforms Are 'Unforwardable Dead Ends' | RiffOn