Manually removing followers in bulk, even if they are bots, causes a sharp drop in your follower count. The algorithm interprets this mass exodus as a sign that your content is failing and consequently shows your future posts to fewer people, effectively penalizing your reach.
Simply automating the posting of social content is not enough for it to succeed. If you or your company do not manually engage with comments and reactions within the first hour of an automated post going live, the platform's algorithm is unlikely to favor it, causing the post to be "dead on arrival."
Posting content just for the sake of it is counterproductive. Low-quality, non-engaging content actively harms your reach by signaling to social media algorithms that users are not interested in your brand. This suppresses visibility for all future posts. It's better to post less frequently with higher quality.
Social media algorithms can be trained. By actively blocking or marking unwanted content as "not interested," users can transform their "for you" page from a source of distracting content into a valuable, curated feed of recommended information.
Contrary to some growth-hacking advice, stuffing captions with keywords or hiding them in videos is considered spammy behavior by Instagram's algorithm. This practice will result in your content being actively penalized and shown to fewer people.
Telling users "link in bio" directs them away from your post before they can like or comment. This lack of engagement signals the algorithm to limit your reach. Use DM automation CTAs (e.g., "comment 'SALE' for the link") instead to boost interaction and visibility.
Telling users to 'click the link in bio' actively instructs your most interested audience members to stop engaging with your content (liking, commenting, saving) and navigate away. This lack of engagement from interested parties signals to the algorithm that the post is not valuable, reducing its reach.
The algorithm now prioritizes content quality over follower count, leveling the playing field. This removes the historical advantage large accounts had, making it feel like they are being disadvantaged or "shadowbanned" when they are simply competing on equal footing with smaller creators.
LinkedIn actively suppresses the reach of users who accumulate large, unengaged audiences via mass connection requests. The platform algorithmically favors smaller, highly engaged networks over large, passive ones, making audience quality more important than sheer quantity for content visibility.
Contrary to popular belief, Instagram's algorithm does not reward accounts for direct engagement activities like replying to comments or DMs. While these actions foster community goodwill, they are not a factor in content reach. For time-strapped creators, posting new content provides a far greater growth ROI.
When announcing a new niche account, explicitly ask friends and family *not* to follow unless they're genuinely interested in the topic. Well-meaning but unengaged followers harm your account by signaling to the algorithm that your content isn't relevant, reducing its overall reach. A smaller, highly-engaged audience is more valuable than a larger, passive one.