Unlike responsive US AI companies, Chinese firms like ByteDance are ignoring copyright concerns with models like SeedDance 2.0. This has forced Hollywood institutions to shift strategy from legal challenges to public pressure campaigns in an attempt to protect their intellectual property.

The public AI debate is a false dichotomy between 'hype folks' and 'doomers.' Both camps operate from the premise that AI is or will be supremely powerful. This shared assumption crowds out a more realistic critique that current AI is a flawed, over-sold product that isn't truly intelligent.

Many people's negative opinions on AI-generated content stem from a deep-seated fear of their jobs becoming obsolete. This emotional reaction will fade as AI content becomes indistinguishable from human-created content, making the current debate a temporary, fear-based phenomenon.

Unlike the tech industry's forward-looking nostalgia, Hollywood's culture is rooted in preserving traditional filmmaking processes. This cultural attachment makes the creative community view AI not just as a job threat, but as an unwelcome disruption to the established craft and order, slowing its adoption as a creative tool.

The Writers' Guild of America strike offers a sophisticated model for labor unions navigating AI. Instead of an outright ban, they negotiated a dual approach: winning protections against AI-driven displacement while also securing guarantees for their members to use AI as an assistive tool for their own benefit.

Former DreamWorks CEO Jeffrey Katzenberg compares the current backlash against AI in creative fields to the initial revolt from traditional animators against computer graphics. He argues that, like computer animation, AI's adoption is an unstoppable technological shift that creators will either join or be left behind by.

The most tangible fear of AI in Hollywood isn't replacing A-list actors, who have leverage for consent and compensation. The immediate threat is to production jobs—grips, makeup—as AI enables digital reshoots and effects, reducing the need for on-set labor.

By openly discussing AI-driven unemployment, tech leaders have made their industry the default scapegoat. If unemployment rises for any reason, even a normal recession, AI will be blamed, triggering severe political and social backlash because leaders have effectively "confessed to the crime" ahead of time.

The moment an industry organizes in protest against an AI technology, it signals that the technology has crossed a critical threshold of quality. The fear and backlash are a direct result of the technology no longer being a gimmick, but a viable threat to the status quo.