Get your free personalized podcast brief

We scan new podcasts and send you the top 5 insights daily.

Jon Gray outlines a tripartite market landscape shaped by AI. It includes clear AI winners, physical-world businesses like medical supplies that are largely immune, and a high-risk category of software and services companies whose moats are now uncertain. This framework guides investment toward clarity and away from ambiguity.

Related Insights

While AI's market performance has been concentrated in the tech sector, its greatest future value will be unlocked as it transforms other industries like healthcare, logistics, and consumer goods. Buchwald believes investors are underestimating this broadening impact, which will create new winners and losers across the entire economy.

Amid uncertainty about which AI applications will win, Blackstone's strategy is to invest in the essential infrastructure all AI companies need. This "picks and shovels" approach targets data centers and electricity, guaranteeing exposure to the boom without betting on specific, high-risk application companies.

Navigate AI's uncertainty with a two-sided "barbell" approach. On one end, make high-risk bets on "AI-first" businesses. On the other, invest in stable industries AI won't eliminate, such as healthcare, food, and entertainment, which cater to timeless human needs.

In an era dominated by AI, businesses requiring physical infrastructure and specialized, licensed human intervention (like doctors or pharmacists) are highly defensible. AI can expand the top of the marketing funnel, but the company controlling the real-world delivery and expert services captures the value.

As AI commoditizes software, the most defensible businesses are no longer asset-light SaaS models. Instead, companies with physical world operations, regulatory moats, and liability are safer investments. Their operational complexity, once a weakness, now serves as a formidable barrier against pure AI-driven disruption.

Unlike previous tech shifts like cloud, AI is so disruptive that it creates a viable narrative for how incumbents could either massively win or be completely displaced. This complicates investment decisions across the software sector, as both optimistic and pessimistic outcomes are highly plausible.

Technology's share of the economy will grow as it underpins every industry. Conversely, the services sector, which sells human intelligence for repetitive tasks, is fundamentally threatened by AI that can automate processes and commoditize expertise.

AI doesn't kill all software; it bifurcates the market. Companies with strong moats like distribution, proprietary data, and enterprise lock-in will thrive by integrating AI. However, companies whose only advantage was their software code will be wiped out as AI makes the code itself a commodity. The moat is no longer the software.

The AI investment case might be inverted. While tech firms spend trillions on infrastructure with uncertain returns, traditional sector companies (industrials, healthcare) can leverage powerful AI services for a fraction of the cost. They capture a massive 'value gap,' gaining productivity without the huge capital outlay.

In response to AI's potential to commoditize software, investors are shifting capital to "HALO" businesses like industrial manufacturing and aerospace. These sectors feature heavy physical assets and complex operations that are difficult for AI to replicate, promising lower obsolescence risk.

Blackstone's Jon Gray Sees AI Splitting the Economy Into Winners, Unaffected Physical Businesses, and the Disrupted | RiffOn