The traditional PE strategy involves buying legacy companies and cutting costs by ~10%. AI enables startups to rebuild entire industries from scratch, slashing costs by 90-99%. This allows VCs to fund disruptors that can out-compete and dismantle sectors previously dominated by PE roll-ups.

Related Insights

A market bifurcation is underway where investors prioritize AI startups with extreme growth rates over traditional SaaS companies. This creates a "changing of the guard," forcing established SaaS players to adopt AI aggressively or risk being devalued as legacy assets, while AI-native firms command premium valuations.

Instead of selling software to traditional industries, a more defensible approach is to build vertically integrated companies. This involves acquiring or starting a business in a non-sexy industry (e.g., a law firm, hospital) and rebuilding its entire operational stack with AI at its core, something a pure software vendor cannot do.

Low-cost AI tools create a new paradigm for entrepreneurship. Instead of the traditional "supervised learning" model where VCs provide a playbook, we see a "reinforcement learning" approach. Countless solo founders act as "agents," rapidly testing ideas without capital, allowing the market to reward what works and disrupting the VC value proposition.

The rapid evolution of AI means traditional private equity M&A timelines are too slow. PE firms and their portfolio companies must now behave more like venture capitalists, acquiring earlier-stage, riskier AI companies to secure necessary technology before it becomes unaffordable or obsolete.

The true economic revolution from AI won't come from legacy companies using it as an "add-on." Instead, it will emerge over the next 20 years from new startups whose entire organizational structure and business model are built from the ground up around AI.

Unlike private equity's 3-5 year model focused on debt and cost-cutting, GC's AI roll-ups are structured like venture-backed tech companies. The 7-10 year goal is to build a public "compounder" (like Danaher) that uses AI for operational improvements and reinvests cash flow into more acquisitions.

Incumbents face the innovator's dilemma; they can't afford to scrap existing infrastructure for AI. Startups can build "AI-native" from a clean sheet, creating a fundamental advantage that legacy players can't replicate by just bolting on features.

For over a decade, SaaS products remained relatively unchanged, allowing PE firms to acquire them and profit from high NRR. AI destroys this model. The rate of product change is now unprecedented, meaning products can't be static, introducing a technology risk that PE models are not built for.

The strategy of acquiring incumbent companies to accelerate AI adoption is creating a new investment category. Unlike private equity, which optimizes existing assets for efficiency, this new class focuses on fundamentally transforming them into something entirely new.

The common analogy of AI being "like a website" that every company must adopt may be misleading. The real transformative power of AI could be in enabling entirely new, AI-native businesses that leapfrog incumbents, rather than simply being a feature tacked onto existing products.