The failure of government systems isn't a 'set it and forget it' problem. Rather, it's a 'set it and accrete' problem. New rules, processes, and technologies are continuously layered on top of old ones for decades without ever subtracting anything, resulting in unmanageable, brittle systems.

Related Insights

To avoid organizational decay, government agencies like NASA should be established with a fixed lifespan (e.g., 10 years). At sunset, they would be forced to reconstitute, allowing for a re-evaluation of their mission and shedding of unproductive labs, ensuring continued relevance and success.

The ultimate failure point for a complex system is not the loss of its functional power but the loss of its ability to be understood by insiders and outsiders. This erosion of interpretability happens quietly and long before the more obvious, catastrophic collapse.

Government programs often persist despite failure because their complexity is a feature, not a bug. This system prevents average citizens, who are too busy with their lives, from deciphering the waste and holding the "political industrial complex" accountable, thereby benefiting those in power.

Technology only adds value if it overcomes a constraint. However, organizations build rules and processes (e.g., annual budgeting) to cope with past limitations (e.g., slow data collection). Implementing powerful new tech like AI will fail to deliver ROI if these legacy rules aren't also changed.

Seemingly sudden crashes in tech and markets are not abrupt events but the result of "interpretation debt"—when a system's output capability grows faster than the collective ability to understand, review, and trust it, leading to a quiet erosion of trust.

The government's core model for funding, oversight, and talent management is a relic of the post-WWII industrial era. Slapping modern technology like AI onto this outdated 'operating system' is a recipe for failure. A fundamental backend overhaul is required, not just a frontend facelift.

Well-intentioned laws become distorted through layers of interpretation down the chain of command. This 'cascade of rigidity' results in practices that are inefficient and sometimes contrary to the original legal intent, creating perverse outcomes and process bottlenecks.

Historian Joseph Tainter argues societies collapse when maintaining their complexity consumes all available resources. This applies to organizations, which become fragile by constantly adding complex solutions without a mechanism for simplification. This leaves no buffer to handle the next major, inevitable crisis.

Government procurement is slow because every scandal or instance of fraud leads to new rules and oversight. The public demands this accountability, which in turn creates the very bureaucracy that citizens and vendors complain about.

While most local government data is legally public, its accessibility is hampered by poor quality. Data is often trapped in outdated systems and is full of cumulative human errors, making it useless without extensive cleaning.