For traders, the defining characteristic of an emerging market isn't GDP but how its sovereign bonds behave during risk-off events. If bonds sell off alongside equities when volatility rises, it's an EM. If they rally as a safe haven, it's a developed market, regardless of economic metrics.
Related Insights
Emerging market credit spreads are tightening while developed markets' are widening. This divergence is not a fundamental mispricing but is explained by unique, positive developments in specific sovereigns like post-election Argentina and bonds in Venezuela on hopes of restructuring.
Investors have been holding unhedged US dollar assets to capture both high yields and currency appreciation, a speculative strategy traditionally used for emerging market local currency bonds. This parallel indicates a shift in risk perception, where US assets are no longer seen as a pure safe haven.
Contrary to fears of being a crowded trade, EM fixed income is significantly under-owned by global asset allocators. Since 2012, EM local bonds have seen zero net inflows, while private credit AUM grew by $2 trillion from the same starting point. This suggests substantial room for future capital allocation into the asset class.
The core of J.P. Morgan's repayment risk analysis is a "reserve burn" stress test. It conservatively assumes vulnerable countries are completely shut out of international bond markets. This forces a reliance on existing reserves and other financing, providing a stark measure of their true financial buffers and resilience against market shocks.
While a stronger growth environment supports EM currencies, it is problematic for low-yielding EM government bonds. Their valuations were based on aggressive local central bank easing cycles which now have less scope to continue, especially with a potentially shallower Fed cutting cycle, making them vulnerable to a correction.
Emerging vs. developed market outperformance typically runs in 7-10 year cycles. The current 14-year cycle of EM underperformance is historically long, suggesting markets are approaching a key inflection point driven by a weakening dollar, cheaper currencies, and accelerating earnings growth off a low base.
The link between emerging market currencies (EMFX) and US tech stocks is not about the tech sector itself. Global equity markets have become a unified signal for the global economic cycle. A sell-off worries investors about global growth, impacting risk-on EM currencies regardless of their direct tech exposure.
Contrary to a simple narrative of improved market sentiment, EM sovereign resilience stemmed from unexpectedly strong macro fundamentals. Better-than-forecast current account balances, export performance, FDI, and portfolio inflows were the primary drivers of stability, exceeding even conservative projections from two years prior.
Despite compressed spreads and improved market access, credit markets are not complacent. Pricing for the most vulnerable emerging market sovereigns still implies a significant 17% near-term and 40% five-year probability of default. This is well above historical averages, signaling lingering investor caution and skepticism about long-term stability.
Despite being at historically tight levels, EM sovereign credit spreads are unlikely to widen significantly from an EM-specific slowdown. The catalyst for a major sell-off would have to be a 'beta move' originating from a crisis in core US markets, such as equities or corporate credit, given the current strength of EM fundamentals.