Emerging market credit spreads are tightening while developed markets' are widening. This divergence is not a fundamental mispricing but is explained by unique, positive developments in specific sovereigns like post-election Argentina and bonds in Venezuela on hopes of restructuring.
Related Insights
Emerging market central banks' hawkish commentary while cutting rates reinforces market stability. This low volatility, in turn, gives them confidence to continue the cutting cycle. This feedback loop can make low-volatility periods surprisingly persistent, as the actions and outcomes mutually reinforce each other.
Contrary to fears of being a crowded trade, EM fixed income is significantly under-owned by global asset allocators. Since 2012, EM local bonds have seen zero net inflows, while private credit AUM grew by $2 trillion from the same starting point. This suggests substantial room for future capital allocation into the asset class.
Unlike previous years dominated by a single theme, 2026 will require a more nuanced approach. Performance will be driven by a range of factors including country-specific fiscal dynamics, the end of rate-cutting cycles, election outcomes, and beneficiaries of AI capex. Investors must move from a single macro view to a multi-factor differentiation strategy.
A powerful EM strategy involves identifying businesses with proven, powerful models from developed markets, like American Tower. Local EM investor bases may not be familiar with the model's potential, creating an opportunity to buy these companies at a displaced valuation before their predictable results drive multiple expansion.
A recent global fixed income sell-off was not triggered by a single U.S. event but by a cascade of disparate actions from central banks and data releases in smaller economies like Australia, New Zealand, and Japan. This decentralized shift is an unusual dynamic for markets, leading to dollar weakness.
While default risk exists, the more pressing problem for credit investors is a severe supply-demand imbalance. A shortage of new M&A and corporate issuance, combined with massive sideline capital (e.g., $8T in money markets), keeps spreads historically tight and makes finding attractive opportunities the main challenge.
Brazil's next election presents a major catalyst. An opposition win would likely unlock pent-up investment and allow high real interest rates to fall, creating a virtuous cycle. Conversely, a win for the incumbent party would likely keep rates higher for longer, suppressing growth and investment.
The surge in emerging market sovereign debt isn't uniform. It's heavily influenced by specific situations, such as Mexico issuing massive debt to back its state oil company, Pemex. Additionally, a notable increase in issuance from lower-rated 'Single B' sovereigns indicates renewed market access for riskier credits.
Emerging vs. developed market outperformance typically runs in 7-10 year cycles. The current 14-year cycle of EM underperformance is historically long, suggesting markets are approaching a key inflection point driven by a weakening dollar, cheaper currencies, and accelerating earnings growth off a low base.
Unlike the US, emerging markets are constrained by financial markets. If they let their fiscal balance deteriorate, markets punish their currency, triggering a vicious cycle of inflation and higher interest rates. This threat serves as a natural check on government spending, enforcing a level of fiscal responsibility.