The link between emerging market currencies (EMFX) and US tech stocks is not about the tech sector itself. Global equity markets have become a unified signal for the global economic cycle. A sell-off worries investors about global growth, impacting risk-on EM currencies regardless of their direct tech exposure.
Related Insights
Analysts expect a continued dollar-centric market where most G10 currencies move in tandem against the dollar, keeping dollar correlations high. However, they are bearish on cross-correlations (e.g., involving Sterling and Euro), anticipating greater divergence between non-dollar currencies, which presents an opportunity for investors.
Contrary to the belief that US strength harms the Euro, historical data shows the EUR/USD pair performs best when growth outlooks for *both* regions are being upgraded. This is because the Euro is fundamentally a pro-cyclical 'growth currency,' benefiting from a global risk-on environment even when the US also thrives.
Unlike previous years dominated by a single theme, 2026 will require a more nuanced approach. Performance will be driven by a range of factors including country-specific fiscal dynamics, the end of rate-cutting cycles, election outcomes, and beneficiaries of AI capex. Investors must move from a single macro view to a multi-factor differentiation strategy.
With dollar correlations at elevated levels, finding cheap, clean directional expressions against the dollar is challenging. Sophisticated traders are creating bearish dollar baskets that mix G10 currencies (AUD, NOK) with Emerging Market currencies (HUF, ZAR) to achieve greater pricing efficiency.
Despite investor nervousness after a strong 2025, EM currencies could appreciate against the dollar again in 2026. Analysts argue that the 14-year bear market has turned, citing historical precedent from the 2002-2010 bull market where consecutive positive years were common. This challenges the prevailing investor caution.
Emerging vs. developed market outperformance typically runs in 7-10 year cycles. The current 14-year cycle of EM underperformance is historically long, suggesting markets are approaching a key inflection point driven by a weakening dollar, cheaper currencies, and accelerating earnings growth off a low base.
The most effective FX expression of the AI theme is through carry strategies, not by picking individual currencies. FX carry shows a high correlation with AI-beneficiary equity sectors like tech and energy. This allows a broad basket of high-yield currencies to outperform as a group, even those without direct AI exposure.
The global economy's reliance on a few dominant tech companies creates systemic risk. Unlike a robust, diversified economy, a downturn in a single key player like NVIDIA could trigger a disproportionately severe global recession, described as 'stage four walking pneumonia.' This concentration makes the entire system fragile.
Contrary to the common narrative, large equity inflows into the US from the AI theme are not reliably driving dollar strength. History shows Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) has a much stronger correlation with FX performance. Currently, timely FDI indicators are not showing a meaningful pickup, suggesting a key support for the dollar is missing.
Recessionary risks are higher in Canada and Europe than in the U.S. This weakness doesn't drag the U.S. down; instead, it triggers capital flight into U.S. assets for safety. This flow strengthens the dollar and reinforces the American economy, creating a cycle where U.S. strength feeds on others' fragility.
