Get your free personalized podcast brief

We scan new podcasts and send you the top 5 insights daily.

Don't rely on a potential sponsor's words; investigate their actions. Use LinkedIn to find people who reported to them a few years ago. Are those people still in the same role, or have they been promoted? This provides concrete evidence of their track record.

Related Insights

Standard reference checks yield generic praise. To identify true A-players, ask their former colleagues a high-stakes question: “Would you quit your current job to work for this person again?” An enthusiastic “yes” is the strongest hiring signal you can get.

Placing all your advancement hopes on one sponsor is risky. If they leave the company, lose influence, or the relationship sours, you are back to square one. Instead, cultivate a 'portfolio of sponsors' for different situations to diversify your support system.

Understand the critical difference between mentorship and sponsorship. A mentor offers advice based on their past experiences. A sponsor actively uses their influence and political capital to create concrete opportunities for your advancement. Career acceleration comes from sponsorship.

To assess a leader's ability to spot talent, Zipline asks about their past hires and looks them up on LinkedIn. A powerful positive signal is if the candidate's former reports have achieved massive success themselves, such as getting promoted five times and now leading a 5,000-person division.

When hiring for corp dev roles, assess abstract qualities like work ethic and resilience by asking candidates specific probing questions. Then, ask their provided references the exact same questions to see if the stories corroborate and gain a true sense of character.

Interviews are often misleading. A trusted recommendation from a high-performing employee or contact is a more reliable signal of a candidate's quality than your own interview assessment. This "reference hiring" is a secret weapon for building a strong team.

Salas O'Brien provides every target with a contact list of all previously acquired leaders. If a target fails to perform this reverse diligence by calling these references, it's seen as a major red flag, suggesting their stated commitment to their team's future may not be genuine.

An expensive mis-hire came from a friend's referral. The speaker realized that while she trusted her friends, they lacked the deep marketing expertise to properly evaluate the candidate's skills. This highlights the need to critically assess a referrer's own qualifications in the relevant domain, not just rely on the relationship.

Zipline considers candidate-provided references to be useless ("paid references"). Instead, they invest significant time to network their way to former colleagues not on the official list. These blind references provide brutally honest feedback, revealing both A+ players and those who "leave a trail of destruction."

Standard reference checks yield polite platitudes. To elicit honesty, frame the call around the high stakes for both your company and the candidate. Emphasize that a bad fit hurts the candidate's career and wastes everyone's time. This forces the reference to provide a more candid, risk-assessed answer.