For difficult decisions, ask the simple question: "What does right look like?" and then do that. This framework simplifies complexity. While doing the right thing can be harder or more expensive in the short term, it consistently leads to better outcomes in the long run.

Fredkin's Paradox describes how we waste the most energy on decisions where options are so similar that the choice barely matters. To counteract this, establish "good enough" criteria for most decisions. This prevents agonizing over trivial choices and saves mental energy for high-impact ones.

When faced with imperfect choices, treat the decision like a standardized test question: gather the best available information and choose the option you believe is the *most* correct, even if it's not perfect. This mindset accepts ambiguity and focuses on making the best possible choice in the moment.

Leaders often face analysis paralysis, striving for the perfect choice. This mindset suggests that making a suboptimal decision and adapting is superior to making no decision at all, as inaction stalls momentum and creates uncertainty for the team.

To avoid analysis paralysis in major life decisions like marriage or faith, adopt the Marine Corps' leadership principle: gather 80% of the necessary information, then make a choice and commit. Waiting for 100% certainty is a trap that paralyzes action and postpones happiness.

Aim to make decisions when you have between 40% and 70% of the necessary information. Striving for more than 70% leads to slow, inefficient decision-making, allowing competitors to get ahead. The key is making timely, good-enough decisions, not perfect ones.

Minor routines, like wearing the same style of shirt or eating the same healthy breakfast, are not restrictive. This discipline frees you from decision fatigue on low-impact choices, preserving crucial mental energy for the strategic thinking that actually matters.

Continually seeking the optimal choice ("maximizing") leads to dissatisfaction, regret, and unhappiness. Instead, practice "satisficing" by setting "good enough" criteria for decisions. Once a choice meets these criteria, commit to it and move on, saving cognitive bandwidth for what truly matters.

The key to success is high-volume decision-making with a slight edge, not perfection. Like a casino, being right just over half the time on decisions with measurable outcomes guarantees long-term success. This mindset encourages action over analysis paralysis and accepts failure as part of the process.