People resist new initiatives because the "switching costs" (effort, money, time) are felt upfront and are guaranteed. In contrast, the potential benefits are often far in the future and not guaranteed. This timing and certainty gap creates a powerful psychological bias for the status quo.
To gain buy-in, guide people to your desired outcome through a curated series of questions. This allows them to feel like they are discovering the solution themselves, creating a powerful sense of ownership. They are more likely to commit to a conclusion they feel they helped create.
When people feel their freedom is threatened by a direct command, they experience "reactance," a psychological pushback. P&G's directive "don't eat Tide Pods" triggered this, paradoxically increasing interest and dangerous behavior instead of curbing it.
Instead of pitching a single idea, which invites a yes/no response, present two or three pre-approved options. This gives the other person a sense of autonomy and changes their mental calculus from rejecting your one idea to choosing the best option for them.
When your proposal is too far from someone's current position, it enters their "region of rejection" and is dismissed. Instead of asking for the full change at once, start with a smaller, more palatable request. This builds momentum and makes the ultimate goal seem less distant and more achievable over time.
When customers are hesitant to adopt a new product due to uncertainty about its value or ease of use, lower the upfront cost of trial. Create a low-risk way for them to experience the benefits firsthand, like a car test drive or a 'white glove' training session, to resolve their uncertainty directly.