When Harlem Candle Co. outgrew its warehouse partners due to repeated quality control failures, the founder found the "breakup" process emotionally difficult. Recognizing this wasn't her team's strength, she hired a consultant specifically to manage the professional separation, a tactic she used twice.
Related Insights
The most common failure mode for a founder-CEO isn't a lack of competence, but a crisis of confidence. This leads to hesitation on critical decisions, especially firing an underperforming executive. The excuses for delaying are merely symptoms of this confidence gap.
Terminating an employee shouldn't be viewed solely as a negative outcome. Often, a lack of success is due to a mismatch in chemistry, timing, or culture. Parting ways can be a necessary catalyst that enables the individual to find a different environment where their skills allow them to thrive, benefiting both parties in the long run.
Firing decisions should be a function of both incompetence and business constraint. Not all underperformers are equal priorities. Some are like a "trash can on fire in the driveway"—a problem, but not the company's main bottleneck. Focus firing efforts on roles that are the direct constraint to growth.
Before a major business pivot, first identify what can be let go or scaled back. This creates the necessary space and resources for the new direction, preventing overwhelm and ensuring the pivot is an extension of identity, not just another added task on your plate.
Deciding which products or services to cut can be an emotional process for founders. Amy Porterfield advises removing the "drama" by relying on data. By tracking metrics for each offer, she could make objective decisions to retire those that didn't make business sense, simplifying her path to growth.
Firing someone feels adversarial until you reframe it as a win-win. The employee wants to be successful and valued; if your team isn't the right place for that, helping them move on is a service to their career, not a disservice. This mindset changes the entire dynamic.
After eight years of grinding, the founder recognized he had taken the company as far as his skillset allowed. Instead of clinging to control, he proactively sought an external CEO with the business acumen he lacked, viewing the hire as a "life preserver" to rocket-ship the company's growth.
Founders often fear scaling a service business because they believe only they can provide the 'personal touch.' This is an ego-driven bottleneck. The correct approach is to hire, accept that mistakes will happen, fire underperformers, and use sincere apologies and refunds to repair client relationships. Service failures are a predictable cost of scaling.
To scale an empire, you must separate emotional relationships from business operations. This means implementing checks and balances, like having a third party review a trusted partner's work, not as a sign of distrust but as a standard, unemotional practice. This protects the business from the inherent vulnerabilities of personal feelings.
