Get your free personalized podcast brief

We scan new podcasts and send you the top 5 insights daily.

When negotiating spinout equity, ask both parties what stake would make them feel great if the new company becomes a unicorn. This frames the deal around a massive future success, helping the parent company feel smart for keeping 20% of a billion-dollar outcome while motivating the new team.

Related Insights

When discussing compensation, frame equity as providing four things: cash flow, sale bonus, risk, and control. Most employees only want the first two and actively avoid risk and aren't getting control anyway. This simplifies the conversation and allows you to offer profit share and sale bonuses instead of actual shares.

Don't default to a 50/50 split on day one. Instead, agree to formally discuss equity only after reaching a predefined milestone, like $10,000 in revenue. This allows you to base the split on demonstrated contribution and commitment, avoiding the resentment from premature, misaligned agreements.

When an experienced founder starts a new venture based on their own vision, the equity split doesn't need to be 50/50. By framing it as 'my deal,' the primary founder can retain a supermajority (e.g., 80%) while giving a technical co-founder a smaller but still meaningful stake.

De-risk bringing on co-founders by first hiring them as key employees. Grant ownership over time based on hitting specific milestones, creating a trial period to assess fit and contribution before making a permanent, expensive commitment to an equity partner.

The firm requires sellers to roll 20-40% of their deal consideration into the acquirer's equity. This is a critical screening tool that goes beyond financial alignment, acting as a 'put your money where your mouth is' test to ensure sellers genuinely believe in the combined company's future vision.

GSP goes beyond standard incentive plans by offering "super options" that vest only at high-multiple outcomes (3x, 4x). They believe the incremental dilution is a small price for creating powerful alignment with founders and management to strive for exceptional results.

A 50/50 equity split should not be the default. The conversation must focus on what unique, "unfair advantages" each founder brings to the table. This could be a significant pre-built audience, a deep professional network, or personal capital. The idea itself is rarely worth any equity.

When negotiating a startup job offer, focus on increasing your stock options. Frame the request around your desire to be a bigger 'owner' because you believe in the company's long-term success. This signals commitment and alignment, making employers more receptive than if you simply asked for more cash.

Granting a full co-founder 50% equity is a massive, often regrettable, early decision. A better model is to bring on a 'partner' with a smaller, vested equity stake (e.g., 10%). This provides accountability and complementary skills without sacrificing majority ownership and control.

If a parent company retains too much equity (e.g., 50-80%) in a spinout, it demotivates the new founding team. VCs will refuse to invest in a company where the founders lack sufficient ownership and incentive to drive long-term growth, effectively breaking the cap table from day one.