Arguing against the traditional 60/40 portfolio amidst a market mania, Gundlach advises a radically different allocation. He suggests a maximum of 40% in stocks (mostly non-US), 25% in bonds (with non-dollar exposure), 15% in gold and real assets, and the rest in cash.
Raghuram Rajan explains that central banks are increasing gold reserves not just for diversification, but as a direct response to geopolitical risks like the seizure of Russian assets. This 'weaponization of payments' erodes trust in holding reserves in foreign currencies, making physically controlled gold more attractive as a neutral asset.
When asked why investors stick with US assets despite clear risks, Jeff Gundlach's answer is "Habit." He explains the psychological difficulty of abandoning a winning strategy, even when the underlying paradigm has shifted, keeps investors over-allocated to past winners.
A 100-year chart of the S&P 500 priced in gold shows a major cyclical peak was hit in late 2021, similar to 1929 and 2000. This inflection point suggests a long-term, decade-plus trend reversal favoring hard assets like gold and Bitcoin over U.S. equities.
For moderate-risk, ultra-high-net-worth clients, Goldman Sachs advocates a surprisingly high 27% portfolio allocation to alternatives. The main challenge is implementation, so the firm uses proprietary "commitment planners" to help clients methodically invest capital annually, ensuring diversification across vintage years, strategies, and managers.
The 60/40 portfolio is obsolete because bonds, laden with credit risk, no longer offer safety. A resilient modern portfolio requires a broader mix of uncorrelated assets: cash, gold, currencies, commodities like oil and food, and short-term government debt, while actively avoiding corporate credit.
Bridgewater's Co-CIO argues the winning formula of the last 15 years—concentrating capital in US equities and illiquid assets—is now a dangerous trap. He believes most investors have abandoned diversification because it hasn't worked recently, creating a risky setup that calls for a globally diversified portfolio.
Advisors who recommend fixed allocations like 60/40 without considering current expected returns and risk are committing a form of 'malpractice.' Investment decisions must be dynamic, as the relationship between risk and return is not constant over time.
Contrary to popular belief, Vanguard's chief economist suggests that in a high-debt, low-growth future, overweighting fixed income is superior to holding gold. This assumes the Fed will maintain high real interest rates to fight inflation, making bond yields more attractive than equities, which would face a lost decade.
Contrary to the retail investor's focus on high-yield funds, the 'smart money' first ensures the safety of their capital. They allocate the majority of their portfolio (50-70%) to secure assets, protecting their core fortune before taking calculated risks with the remainder.
To navigate an era of government debt overwhelming monetary policy, investor Lynn Alden proposes a specific three-pillar portfolio. It allocates 50% to profitable equities, 20% to cash for optionality, and a significant 30% to inflation-hedging hard assets like commodities, precious metals, and Bitcoin.