The conflict between Dutch chipmaker Nexperia and its Chinese parent, triggered by US sanctions, shows how European companies are becoming unintended casualties in the broader US-China geopolitical struggle, extending the tech war's impact beyond the two primary nations.
Related Insights
The tariff war was not primarily about revenue but a strategic move to create an "artificial negotiating point." By imposing tariffs, the U.S. could then offer reductions in exchange for European countries committing to American technology and supply chains over China's growing, low-cost alternatives.
The Dutch government took control of Chinese-owned Nexperia, a major European chipmaker, citing national security risks. This move is far more aggressive than U.S. strategies like taking minority stakes, indicating a European willingness to nationalize key tech assets to counter foreign influence in the semiconductor supply chain.
Beyond the US-China rivalry, a new front is opening between Brussels and Beijing. Incidents like the French suspension of fashion retailer Shein are not isolated but symptomatic of growing European mistrust and a willingness to take action. This signals a potential fracturing of global trade blocs and increased regulatory risk for Chinese firms in the EU.
Instead of crippling China, aggressive US sanctions and tech restrictions are having the opposite effect. They have forced China to accelerate its own domestic R&D and manufacturing for advanced technologies like microchips. This is creating a more powerful and self-sufficient competitor that will not be reliant on the West.
While large firms like NVIDIA can onshore manufacturing, small hardware startups relying on Chinese production are the primary casualties of tariffs. They lack the scale to move supply chains or secure exemptions, eroding their margins and weakening their negotiating position with investors.
Restricting allies like the UAE from buying U.S. AI chips is a counterproductive policy. It doesn't deny them access to AI; it pushes them to purchase Chinese alternatives like Huawei. This strategy inadvertently builds up China's market share and creates a global technology ecosystem centered around a key U.S. competitor.
While headlines focus on advanced chips, China’s real leverage comes from its strategic control over less glamorous but essential upstream inputs like rare earths and magnets. It has even banned the export of magnet-making technology, creating critical, hard-to-solve bottlenecks for Western manufacturing.
The Nexperia dispute reveals China's strategic leverage. By controlling the supply of mid-tech chips for basic car functions like airbags and windows, Beijing can cripple major European automakers, demonstrating its influence over global supply chains beyond just high-end tech.
Contrary to their intent, U.S. export controls on AI chips have backfired. Instead of crippling China's AI development, the restrictions provided the necessary incentive for China to aggressively invest in and accelerate its own semiconductor industry, potentially eroding the U.S.'s long-term competitive advantage.
U.S. export controls on advanced semiconductors, intended to slow China, have instead galvanized its domestic industry. The restrictions accelerated China's existing push for self-sufficiency, forcing local companies to innovate with less advanced chips and develop their own GPU and manufacturing capabilities, diminishing the policy's long-term effectiveness.
