When sales calls feel positive but result in ghosting, founders often blame a lack of urgency. The real problem is usually a flawed conversational approach. These "polite train wrecks" feel good in the moment but fail to address the customer's core needs, leading to a misdiagnosis of why the sale failed.

Related Insights

The desire to appear intelligent causes founders to avoid simple questions and instead anticipate needs. This leads to incorrect assumptions. Asking basic, even "stupid," questions like "Why did you take this call?" is the key to understanding the customer's real needs and ultimately closing the deal.

Early-stage startups can't afford to be strung along by enterprise prospects. The goal isn't just to close deals, but to get feedback quickly. Founders must design a sales process that forces a decision, because a "long maybe will kill you." It's better to get a fast "no" and move on.

Many sales calls follow a rigid framework of questions without a clear goal. This leads to confusing customer responses ("demand hairball") and a premature, ineffective product demo. The focus is on pushing supply instead of truly understanding the customer's blocked demand.

Founders often try to prove their value in a sales call by offering free advice or workshops. This "helpful" approach usually fails because it ignores the customer's specific, often simple, questions for taking the call in the first place. It provides answers to questions they never asked, causing frustration.

Sales conversations often rush to demo a "better" product, assuming the buyer wants to improve. The crucial first step is to help the prospect recognize and quantify the hidden costs of their current "good enough" process, creating urgency to change before a solution is ever introduced.

Salespeople become 'narcissistic' when they are so focused on their own solution and capabilities that they fail to listen to the customer. This self-involvement is fatal because customers don't care what a product does; they care about solving their specific problem.

A successful sales call is not about pitching; it's about asking two simple questions: "Why did you take this call?" and "What do you hope to get out of it?" The entire conversation should be structured around the customer's answers, rendering any pre-planned agenda secondary and potentially counterproductive.

Buyers often volunteer the exact details of their problem—their project, its urgency, and their frustration with current options. However, traditional sales training teaches founders to ignore these cues, interrupt the customer, and pivot to pitching their solution, thereby missing critical information.

Founders often believe leading with their mission will attract customers. This approach is counterproductive, turning the sales call into a "weird moralizing lecture." Customers care about their own problems and to-do lists, not the seller's "why," making this approach ineffective and often annoying.

Deals are lost when salespeople fail to spend enough time in discovery to understand the customer's true need. They must identify the 'moment of demand'—when the customer both recognizes their problem and is ready to decide—rather than rushing to the close with the wrong solution.

Founders Mistake "Polite Train Wreck" Sales Calls for Productive Conversations | RiffOn