Cuban argues building humanoid robots is wasteful because our world is designed for human limitations. True innovation lies in redesigning spaces (homes, factories) for more optimal, non-humanoid robots, like spider drones, that can perform tasks more efficiently.
Related Insights
Ken Goldberg's company, Ambi Robotics, successfully uses simple suction cups for logistics. He argues that the industry's focus on human-like hands is misplaced, as simpler grippers are more practical, reliable, and capable of performing immensely complex tasks today.
Human cognition is a full-body experience, not just a brain function. Current AIs are 'disembodied brains,' fundamentally limited by their lack of physical interaction with the world. Integrating AI into robotics is the necessary next step toward more holistic intelligence.
Unlike co-pilots that assist developers, Factory's “droids” are designed to be autonomous. This reframes the developer's job from writing code to mastering delegation—clearly defining tasks and success criteria for an AI agent to execute independently.
The most significant societal and economic impact of AI won't be from chatbots. Instead, it will emerge from the integration of AI with physical robotics in sectors like manufacturing, logistics (Amazon), and autonomous vehicles (Waymo), which are currently under-hyped.
The future of humanoid robotics is not in our homes. While they will revolutionize structured B2B environments like 'dark' factories and data centers, consumer adoption will lag significantly due to a fundamental lack of desire for robots in personal, nuanced spaces.
The humanoid form factor presents significant safety hazards in a home, such as a heavy robot becoming a “ballistic missile” if it falls down stairs. Simpler, specialized, low-mass designs are far more cost-effective and safer for domestic environments.
The current excitement for consumer humanoid robots mirrors the premature hype cycle of VR in the early 2010s. Robotics experts argue that practical, revenue-generating applications are not in the home but in specific industrial settings like warehouses and factories, where the technology is already commercially viable.
The dream of a do-everything humanoid is a top-down approach that will take a long time. Roboticist Ken Goldberg argues for a bottom-up strategy: master specific, valuable tasks like folding clothes or making coffee reliably first. General intelligence will emerge from combining these skills over time.
While 2025 saw major advancements for robots in commercial settings like autonomous driving (Waymo) and logistics (Amazon), consumer-facing humanoid robots remain impractical. They lack the fine motor skills and dexterity required for complex household chores, failing the metaphorical "laundry test."
Elias Torres argues that the current AI paradigm, which focuses on tools that assist humans (e.g., summarizers, drafters), is fundamentally limited. He believes true value is unlocked when you can instruct an AI to perform a task *infinitely* on its own, without requiring a human to type into a chat box for every action.
