In the Cartitude 1 trial, the strongest predictor of long-term remission with Siltacel was a lower burden of disease (measured by bone marrow percentage and soluble BCMA levels), rather than the number of prior treatments. This implies using CAR-T therapy earlier in the disease course is more effective.

Clinicians must weigh the immediate benefit of using community-accessible belantumab against the risk of reducing the efficacy of future BCMA-targeted therapies like CAR-T or bispecifics. This decision hinges on a patient's ability to travel and access advanced care, creating a complex treatment sequencing challenge.

In follicular lymphoma, the treatment goal is durable remission with manageable toxicity, not necessarily a cure. Therefore, clinicians frequently prefer using a bispecific antibody first, reserving the more complex and toxic CAR-T cell therapy for transformed disease or after a bispecific fails.

Unlike some targeted therapies that lead to antigen loss, treatment with the CD19-directed antibody tafasitamab does not appear to eliminate CD19 expression on lymphoma cells. This is a critical finding, as it preserves the target for subsequent potent therapies like CD19-directed CAR T-cells.

Not all CD20-targeting bispecifics can be combined with rituximab. Mosunetuzumab binds the same epitope, causing competition. However, glofitamab and epcoritamab bind different epitopes, allowing for logical and potentially synergistic combinations with rituximab-based regimens.

The future of medicine isn't about finding a single 'best' modality like CAR-T or gene therapy. Instead, it's about strategic convergence, choosing the right tool—be it a bispecific, ADC, or another biologic—based on the patient's specific disease stage and urgency of treatment.

Using a BCMA bispecific antibody first can exhaust a patient's T-cells or cause tumors to lose the BCMA target, rendering a subsequent BCMA-targeted CAR-T therapy ineffective. The optimal sequence is CAR-T first, which preserves T-cell function and BCMA expression, leaving bispecifics as a viable later-line option.

Rather than expecting cell therapies (CAR-T, TIL) to eradicate every cancer cell, Dr. Radvanyi reframes them as powerful adjuvants. Their role is to inflict initial damage, kill tumor cells, and release antigens, creating an opportunity to prime a broader, secondary immune response with other modalities like vaccines or checkpoint inhibitors.

The interpretation of ctDNA is context-dependent. Unlike in the adjuvant setting, in the neoadjuvant setting, remaining ctDNA positive post-treatment signifies that the current therapy has failed. These high-risk patients need a different therapeutic approach, not an extension of the ineffective one.