Google's strategy involves building specialized models (e.g., Veo for video) to push the frontier in a single modality. The learnings and breakthroughs from these focused efforts are then integrated back into the core, multimodal Gemini model, accelerating its overall capabilities.
Related Insights
Advanced generative media workflows are not simple text-to-video prompts. Top customers chain an average of 14 different models for tasks like image generation, upscaling, and image-to-video transitions. This multi-model complexity is a key reason developers prefer open-source for its granular control over each step.
Instead of manually taking notes during research, use an LLM with a large context window (like Gemini) to process long video transcripts. This creates a searchable, summarized chat from hours of content, allowing you to quickly pull key points and unique perspectives for your own writing.
The path to a general-purpose AI model is not to tackle the entire problem at once. A more effective strategy is to start with a highly constrained domain, like generating only Minecraft videos. Once the model works reliably in that narrow distribution, incrementally expand the training data and complexity, using each step as a foundation for the next.
While today's focus is on text-based LLMs, the true, defensible AI battleground will be in complex modalities like video. Generating video requires multiple interacting models and unique architectures, creating far greater potential for differentiation and a wider competitive moat than text-based interfaces, which will become commoditized.
Google's Gemini models show that a company can recover from a late start to achieve technical parity, or even superiority, in AI. However, this comeback highlights that the real challenge is translating technological prowess into product market share and user adoption, where it still lags.
While ChatGPT still dominates (90% usage), Google Gemini has surged from 33% to 51% adoption in just one year. This rapid growth is likely driven by its deep integration into the Google Workspace ecosystem that businesses already use and pay for.
Instead of writing detailed specs, product teams at Google use AI Studio to build functional prototypes. They provide a screenshot of an existing UI and prompt the AI to clone it while adding new features, dramatically accelerating the product exploration and innovation cycle.
Initially, even OpenAI believed a single, ultimate 'model to rule them all' would emerge. This thinking has completely changed to favor a proliferation of specialized models, creating a healthier, less winner-take-all ecosystem where different models serve different needs.
While competitors like OpenAI must buy GPUs from NVIDIA, Google trains its frontier AI models (like Gemini) on its own custom Tensor Processing Units (TPUs). This vertical integration gives Google a significant, often overlooked, strategic advantage in cost, efficiency, and long-term innovation in the AI race.
Instead of offering a model selector, creating a proprietary, branded model allows a company to chain different specialized models for various sub-tasks (e.g., search, generation). This not only improves overall performance but also provides business independence from the pricing and launch cycles of a single frontier model lab.
