AI's most significant impact won't be on broad population health management, but as a diagnostic and decision-support assistant for physicians. By analyzing an individual patient's risks and co-morbidities, AI can empower doctors to make better, earlier diagnoses, addressing the core problem of physicians lacking time for deep patient analysis.

To maintain trust, AI in medical communications must be subordinate to human judgment. The ultimate guardrail is remembering that healthcare decisions are made by people, for people. AI should assist, not replace, the human communicator to prevent algorithmic control over healthcare choices.

To overcome resistance, AI in healthcare must be positioned as a tool that enhances, not replaces, the physician. The system provides a data-driven playbook of treatment options, but the final, nuanced decision rightfully remains with the doctor, fostering trust and adoption.

The most effective AI strategy focuses on 'micro workflows'—small, discrete tasks like summarizing patient data. By optimizing these countless small steps, AI can make decision-makers 'a hundred-fold more productive,' delivering massive cumulative value without relying on a single, high-risk autonomous solution.

Hospitals are adopting a phased approach to AI. They start with commercially ready, low-risk, non-clinical applications like RCM. This allows them to build an internal 'AI muscle'—developing frameworks and expertise—before expanding into more sensitive, higher-stakes areas like patient engagement and clinical decision support.

An effective AI strategy in healthcare is not limited to consumer-facing assistants. A critical focus is building tools to augment the clinicians themselves. An AI 'assistant' for doctors to surface information and guide decisions scales expertise and improves care quality from the inside out.

A key risk for AI in healthcare is its tendency to present information with unwarranted certainty, like an "overconfident intern who doesn't know what they don't know." To be safe, these systems must display "calibrated uncertainty," show their sources, and have clear accountability frameworks for when they are inevitably wrong.

Instead of replacing experts, AI can reformat their advice. It can take a doctor's diagnosis and transform it into a digestible, day-by-day plan tailored to a user's specific goals and timeline, making complex medical guidance easier to follow.

Society holds AI in healthcare to a much higher standard than human practitioners, similar to the scrutiny faced by driverless cars. We demand AI be 10x better, not just marginally better, which slows adoption. This means AI will first roll out in controlled use cases or as a human-assisting tool, not for full autonomy.