Higher interest rates on government debt are creating a significant income stream for seniors, who hold a large amount of cash-like assets. This cohort's increased spending power—either for themselves or passed down to younger generations—acts as a counterintuitive fiscal stimulus, offsetting the intended tightening effects of the Fed's policy.
Related Insights
The Fed kept interest rates higher for months due to economic uncertainty caused by Donald Trump's tariff policies. This directly increased borrowing costs for consumers on credit cards, car loans, and variable-rate mortgages, creating a tangible financial impact from political actions.
Sweden's 2026 budget introduced unfunded reforms worth 1.2% of GDP, far exceeding expectations. This large fiscal injection surprised markets, pushed interest rates higher, and shows how expansionary government spending can counteract a central bank's monetary policy signals.
Recent inflation was primarily driven by fiscal spending, not the bank-lending credit booms of the 1970s. The Fed’s main tool—raising interest rates—is designed to curb bank lending. This creates a mismatch where the Fed is slowing the private sector to counteract a problem created by the public sector.
While high-income spending remains stable, the next wave of consumption growth will stem from a recovery in the middle-income segment. This rebound will be driven by stabilizing factors like reduced policy uncertainty and neutral monetary policy, not a major labor market acceleration.
Due to massive government debt, the Fed's tools work paradoxically. Raising rates increases the deficit via higher interest payments, which is stimulative. Cutting rates is also inherently stimulative. The Fed is no longer controlling inflation but merely choosing the path through which it occurs.
When government spending is massive ("fiscal dominance"), the Federal Reserve's ability to manage the economy via interest rates is neutralized. The government's deficit spending is so large that it dictates economic conditions, rendering rate cuts ineffective at solving structural problems.
Over the past few years, the Treasury Department and the Federal Reserve have been working at cross-purposes. While the Fed attempted to remove liquidity from the system via quantitative tightening, the Treasury effectively reinjected it by drawing down its reverse repo facility and focusing issuance on T-bills.
Large, ongoing fiscal deficits are now the primary driver of the U.S. economy, a factor many macro analysts are missing. This sustained government spending creates a higher floor for economic activity and asset prices, rendering traditional monetary policy indicators less effective and making the economy behave more like a fiscally dominant state.
The Federal Reserve's anticipated rate cuts are not a signal of an aggressive easing cycle but a move towards a neutral policy stance. The primary impact will be modest relief in interest-sensitive areas like housing, rather than sparking a broad consumer spending surge.
The majority of the $7 trillion COVID-19 stimulus was saved, not spent, flowing directly into assets like stocks and real estate. This disproportionately enriched older generations who own these assets, interrupting the natural economic cycle and widening the wealth gap.
