Institutional investors are increasingly allocating capital to the mid-market, and for good reason. Data from the last decade shows top-quartile mid-market sponsors have outperformed their large-cap counterparts by an average of 7.2% per year, a compelling driver for the strategic shift in institutional focus.
Related Insights
The primary growth drivers for private equity—sovereign wealth and private wealth channels—prefer concentrating capital in large, brand-name firms. This capital shift starves middle-market players of new funds, leading to a likely industry contraction where many may have unknowingly raised their last fund.
There's a surprising disconnect between the perceived brilliance of individual investors at large, well-known private equity firms and their actual net-to-LP returns, which are often no better than the market median. This violates the assumption that top talent automatically generates outlier results.
The quality of public small-cap companies, measured by Return on Invested Capital (ROIC), has plummeted from 7.5% to 3% over 30 years. This degradation means high-growth opportunities now predominantly exist in the later-stage private markets. Institutional investors must shift their asset allocation to venture and growth equity, which has become "the big leagues," not a bespoke asset class.
The mid-market offers the best risk-reward by targeting profitable, regional leaders. This segment is less competitive and process-driven, allowing for better valuations and sourcing compared to the overcrowded large-cap space or the hit-or-miss venture capital scene.
Unlike larger, more transactional deals, mid-market GP stakes investors win by becoming the "partner of choice." The target firms need both capital and operational expertise, allowing the investor to differentiate on value-add capabilities and avoid competing solely on offering the highest valuation.
The private equity market is following the hedge fund industry's maturation curve. Just as hedge funds saw a consolidation around large platforms and niche specialists, a "shakeout" is coming for undifferentiated, mid-market private equity firms that lack a unique edge or sufficient scale.
In a world of commoditized capital, offering a full suite of solutions creates a competitive advantage. By providing fund investments, co-investments, secondary liquidity, and portfolio company debt, a firm becomes an indispensable strategic partner to PE sponsors, generating proprietary and superior deal flow.
Contrary to the belief that smaller VC funds generate higher multiples, a16z's data shows their larger funds can outperform. This is driven by the massive expansion of private markets, where significant value is now created in later growth stages (Series C and beyond).
The era of generating returns through leverage and multiple expansion is over. Future success in PE will come from driving revenue growth, entering at lower multiples, and adding operational expertise, particularly in the fragmented middle market where these opportunities are more prevalent.
The independent sponsor model allows for longer hold periods, focusing on maximizing a single asset's value. This avoids the fund-driven temptation to sell successful companies prematurely to show a high IRR to LPs for the next fundraising round, capturing more value in the later years of an investment.
