The urgent need to calculate exposure to Lehman during the 2008 crisis forced Goldman Sachs to centralize its disparate data. This crisis-driven project revealed the immense business value of data, shifting its perception from "business exhaust" to a strategic enabler for the firm.
Hedge funds have a constant, daily need to make informed buy, sell, or hold decisions, creating a clear business problem that data solves. Corporations often lack this frequent, high-stakes decision-making cycle, making the value proposition of external data less immediate and harder to justify.
Despite promises of a single source of truth, modern data platforms like Snowflake are often deployed for specific departments (e.g., marketing, finance), creating larger, more entrenched silos. This decentralization paradox persists because different business functions like analytics and operations require purpose-built data repositories, preventing true enterprise-wide consolidation.
Alan Waxman saw how 10 siloed Goldman Sachs investing groups made contradictory, costly bets during the 2001 telecom bust. This direct observation of dysfunctional "fiefdoms" led him to build Sixth Street with a mandatory, collaborative "one team" structure to ensure cross-functional insight and avoid repeating those same mistakes.
Data governance is often seen as a cost center. Reframe it as an enabler of revenue by showing how trusted, standardized data reduces the "idea to insight" cycle. This allows executives to make faster, more confident decisions that drive growth and secure buy-in.
When approached by large labs for licensing deals, GI's founder advises against simply selling the data. He argues the only way to accurately value a unique dataset is to model it yourself to understand its true capabilities. Without this, founders risk massively undervaluing their core asset, as its potential is unknown.
When driving major organizational change, a data-driven approach from the start is crucial for overcoming emotional resistance to established ways of working. Building a strong business case based on financial and market metrics can depersonalize the discussion and align stakeholders more quickly than relying on vision alone.
The primary reason multi-million dollar AI initiatives stall or fail is not the sophistication of the models, but the underlying data layer. Traditional data infrastructure creates delays in moving and duplicating information, preventing the real-time, comprehensive data access required for AI to deliver business value. The focus on algorithms misses this foundational roadblock.
Beyond automating data collection, investment firms can use AI to generate novel analytical frameworks. By asking AI to find new ways to plot and interpret data inputs, the team moves from rote data entry to higher-level analysis, using the technology as a creative and strategic partner.
According to Salesforce's AI chief, the primary challenge for large companies deploying AI is harmonizing data across siloed departments, like sales and marketing. AI cannot operate effectively without connected, unified data, making data integration the crucial first step before any advanced AI implementation.