Trials like the dostarlimab study in rectal cancer and NICHE in colon cancer show neoadjuvant immunotherapy can induce profound responses in MSI-high tumors. This is creating a new paradigm where major surgery might be avoided entirely for some patients, marking a significant shift in treatment strategy.

Following positive Phase III data for adjuvant atezolizumab plus chemotherapy in Stage III MSI-high colon cancer, clinicians are extrapolating this approach to high-risk Stage II patients. For some, they favor using immunotherapy alone, omitting chemotherapy due to its perceived limited additional benefit in the Stage II setting.

The STELLAR-303 trial is the first to show an immunotherapy-based regimen provides an overall survival benefit in microsatellite-stable CRC. Crucially, this benefit extends to patients with liver metastases, a subgroup that has historically shown profound resistance to immunotherapy, highlighting the drug's novel mechanism.

While the ATOMIC trial established FOLFOX plus atezolizumab as a new standard for adjuvant therapy in MSI-high colon cancer, its design lacked an immunotherapy-only arm. This leaves a critical, unanswered question about the actual contribution and necessity of the chemotherapy component.

While immunotherapy is largely ineffective in metastatic microsatellite stable (MSS) colorectal cancer, emerging data suggests it may have surprising efficacy in the early-stage (neoadjuvant) setting. This differential response is likely due to a more favorable tumor microenvironment in earlier disease, suggesting a new therapeutic window.

Retrospective data suggests patients with MSI-high rectal cancer might not just respond poorly to standard neoadjuvant chemoradiation (TNT), but their disease could actually progress. This makes immunotherapy a potentially safer and more effective first-line neoadjuvant choice, not just an alternative.

The COMET study found combining chemotherapy with atezolizumab did not improve overall survival versus atezolizumab alone. However, it nearly eliminated early progressive disease (2.8% vs. 32.4%), suggesting a critical role for patients with high tumor burden who cannot risk initial progression on monotherapy.

The KEYNOTE-177 trial allowed patients on the chemotherapy arm to cross over to pembrolizumab upon progression. Despite this, pembrolizumab showed a significant survival advantage, implying the actual benefit of using immunotherapy first-line is even greater than what the data shows.

For fit patients with metastatic MSI-high colorectal cancer, the combination of ipilimumab and nivolumab is the preferred frontline treatment over pembrolizumab monotherapy. This is based on Phase III data showing the dual IO approach is superior. Single-agent PD-1 inhibitors are reserved for frail patients or those with autoimmune comorbidities.