Get your free personalized podcast brief
We scan new podcasts and send you the top 5 insights daily.
With multiple new effective options in platinum-resistant disease (relacorilant, pembrolizumab, ADCs), the key clinical question is shifting from choosing one superior drug to determining the optimal sequence. Biomarkers can guide initial choices, but sequencing multiple regimens, including re-using weekly paclitaxel backbones, is now a viable strategy.
Related Insights
The treatment landscape for platinum-resistant ovarian cancer has rapidly evolved into a biomarker-driven paradigm. Clinicians must now test for and choose between therapies targeting distinct markers like folate receptor alpha (mirvetuximab), HER2 (T-DXd), and PD-L1 (pembrolizumab), requiring a sophisticated sequencing strategy.
The B96 trial's potential approval for platinum-resistant ovarian cancer introduces a new treatment sequencing challenge. Clinicians must decide between this immunotherapy combination and the ADC mervituximab, which has a clear biomarker (foliate receptor alpha). The lack of a reliable biomarker for the B96 regimen complicates this decision-making process for patients.
After numerous failed trials suggested immunotherapy was ineffective in ovarian cancer, the KEYNOTE B96 study marks a turning point. Combining pembrolizumab with chemotherapy showed statistically significant improvements in both progression-free and overall survival in platinum-resistant patients, reviving the entire therapeutic class for this disease.
The arrival of multiple effective, biomarker-linked therapies for diseases like ovarian cancer creates a new, complex challenge for oncologists. No longer a matter of choosing the single best next option, treatment has become a strategic game of sequencing, requiring physicians to think "five plays ahead" to maximize the benefit of all available drugs over the patient's lifetime.
After a decade with no new therapies improving survival, the landscape for platinum-resistant ovarian cancer is transforming. The recent successes of mirvetuximab, the pembrolizumab/paclitaxel combo, and relacorilant/nab-paclitaxel have all demonstrated statistically significant overall survival benefits, heralding a new era of effective options.
Despite the KEYNOTE-B96 trial showing a statistically significant survival benefit, the expert's enthusiasm for adding pembrolizumab in platinum-resistant ovarian cancer is only "neutral." This hesitation stems from challenges in sequencing it with other effective therapies and uncertainty about which patient subgroups truly benefit.
When planning treatment for patients who will receive multiple antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs), the prevailing clinical strategy is to focus on alternating the drug's payload (e.g., a tubulin inhibitor vs. a topoisomerase I inhibitor). This approach is believed to be more effective at overcoming resistance than alternating the cell-surface target.
Despite concerns about cross-resistance from breast cancer data, experts would consider sequencing ADCs with the same payload (e.g., deruxtecan). The rationale is that even a diminished response rate (e.g., 30%) is still significantly better than the 15% seen with standard single-agent cytotoxics.
Most new antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) for ovarian cancer use the same topoisomerase-1 (Topo1) inhibitor payload. This similarity will likely prevent their sequential use due to cross-resistance, forcing clinicians into a "one-shot" scenario where they must choose the single best Topo1-based ADC upfront for a patient.
Historically, therapies for platinum-resistant ovarian cancer were so ineffective that the order of administration was irrelevant. With the advent of multiple active ADCs, the concept of treatment sequencing and potential cross-resistance based on payloads or targets has become a critical, and entirely new, clinical consideration for this disease.
