To combat payload-related resistance, clinicians are reluctant to use two ADCs with the same payload (e.g., a deruxtecan) consecutively. The preferred strategy is to 'sandwich' a different class of chemotherapy between the two ADCs, hoping to restore sensitivity to the payload.

A "tsunami" of antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) are in development for ovarian cancer, but many share the same TOP1 inhibitor payload. This creates a significant future clinical challenge: after a patient progresses on one such ADC, it is unknown if another with the same payload will be effective, creating an urgent need for sequencing data.

Dr. O'Malley avoids using multiple ADCs with the same TOPA-1 payload sequentially due to a lack of data. However, he will reuse a target if the subsequent ADC has a different, non-cross-resistant payload, such as an anti-microtubulin. This is a practical strategy to manage resistance in a data-sparse environment, prioritizing payload diversity over simply switching targets.

Patients whose ovarian cancer progresses on the folate-targeted ADC mirvetuximab may still respond to a subsequent folate-targeted ADC with a different cytotoxic payload. This suggests that the folate receptor alpha target remains viable and that resistance may be payload-specific, opening new sequencing strategies.

Retrospective data shows that using one Antibody-Drug Conjugate (ADC) after another, particularly those with the same class of payload like TOP1 inhibitors, results in a low response rate of 10-20%. This creates a significant unmet need and a major clinical challenge for patients who progress on a first-line ADC.

Experts question the efficacy of sequencing ADCs like EV (Nectin-4 target) and DV (HER2 target) because they share the same MMAE chemo payload. Since resistance is often tied to the payload, not the target antibody, switching targets may not overcome resistance, though anecdotal responses have been observed.

When planning treatment for patients who will receive multiple antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs), the prevailing clinical strategy is to focus on alternating the drug's payload (e.g., a tubulin inhibitor vs. a topoisomerase I inhibitor). This approach is believed to be more effective at overcoming resistance than alternating the cell-surface target.

A surprising trend in ovarian cancer is the consistent efficacy of antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) with a TOPA1 payload. Regardless of the specific cell surface target, these agents are achieving response rates around 50%, suggesting the payload's potency is the primary driver.

Most new antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) for ovarian cancer use the same topoisomerase-1 (Topo1) inhibitor payload. This similarity will likely prevent their sequential use due to cross-resistance, forcing clinicians into a "one-shot" scenario where they must choose the single best Topo1-based ADC upfront for a patient.