Political actions are often driven by a leader's narrow self-interest rather than the good of their country, party, or ideological group. Decisions frequently benefit the leader's immediate circle, even when it damages the broader faction they represent, as seen with politicians unwilling to step aside for their party's benefit.

The root of political decay isn't a lack of capable leaders, but a systemic failure to hold them accountable. The current system incentivizes corruption, demonization, and the violation of norms because there are no meaningful repercussions. This reframes the problem from a search for better individuals to a need for systemic reform that enforces consequences for bad behavior.

Our default method for promotion—open competition—is flawed because it disproportionately attracts and rewards individuals who most desire power, not necessarily those best suited for leadership. The Founding Fathers understood this, preferring reluctant leaders. Alternative models, like deliberation by a select body, can produce more competent and less self-interested leaders.

A pragmatic view of politicians is to see them as rational actors pursuing their own self-interest. They will advocate for their constituents only when it aligns with their goals, such as getting re-elected. When that alignment ends, so does their support.

The electoral process inherently favors wealthy, socially connected, and power-seeking individuals. This systematically excludes more reserved but capable citizens, creating a political class with significant blind spots that is often unresponsive to the majority's needs.

To combat corruption, the US should consider Singapore's model: pay elected officials significantly higher salaries (e.g., $1-2 million) but enforce absolute zero tolerance for insider trading or lobbying conflicts. This approach professionalizes public service and removes the financial incentive for illicit activities.

Politicians often operate as actors in a performative 'kabuki theater' for the public. Their words and actions are scripted not by genuine belief or policy goals, but by the interests of their financial backers and the need to secure reelection.

The public's tolerance for political corruption stems from a broader cultural shift mirroring an economic model where success is celebrated regardless of ethical costs. If CEOs can decimate communities for profit, politicians are seen as entitled to their rewards after winning an election.

The US political system is cursed by elderly leaders who refuse to leave. The problem isn't age itself, but an incentive structure that rewards incumbency, celebrity, and fundraising over the energy and new perspectives of younger generations, creating a gerontocracy.