Michael Burry's thesis is that aggressive stock-based compensation (SBC) at companies like Nvidia significantly distorts their valuations. By treating SBC as a true owner's cost, a stock appearing to trade at 30 times earnings might actually be closer to 60 times, mirroring dot-com era accounting concerns.

Snap's valuation languishes despite a massive user base because of its extreme stock-based compensation ($2.5B in 12 months). This financial tactic inflates adjusted profits while massively diluting shareholders, revealing a fundamental disconnect between user growth and actual investor value creation.

The "SaaSpocalypse" isn't about current revenues but a collapse in investor confidence. AI introduces profound uncertainty about future cash flows, causing the market to heavily discount what was once seen as bond-like predictability. SaaS firms must now actively prove they are beneficiaries of AI to regain their premium valuations.

SaaS stocks are plummeting not because of poor current earnings, but because AI's rapid advancement makes their long-term cash flows unpredictable. Investors, who once valued SaaS like a predictable government bond, now place it in a "too hard bucket," crushing its terminal value multiple.

During the bubble, a lack of profits was paradoxically an advantage for tech stocks. It removed traditional valuation metrics like P/E ratios that would have anchored prices to reality. This "valuation vacuum" allowed investors' imaginations and narratives to drive stock prices to speculative heights.

Unlike past panics in sectors with tangible assets like banking, the SaaS panic is unique. AI can quickly erode the intangible value (code, contracts) of software companies, potentially leaving equity holders with nothing. This makes "buying the dip" exceptionally risky.

The ongoing decline in growth rates for public SaaS companies has created an existential crisis around revenue durability. Investors have lost confidence that traditional SaaS models can sustain growth in the face of AI disruption, leading to a massive valuation collapse.

The recent $300B SaaS stock sell-off wasn't driven by current performance. Investors are repricing stocks based on deep uncertainty about whether legacy software companies or AI-native firms will capture the value of automating human labor in the next 3-5 years.

Unlike with consumer brands, most investors have never used complex enterprise software like Veeva. This lack of product intuition means they rely on financial tables and narratives, making the sector highly susceptible to panic-selling during crises like the 'SaaSpocalypse'.